Need Help Understanding Expanding Universe

In summary, the universe is most commonly described as expanding without an edge or boundary. This means that there is no physical place that the universe has not reached yet and there is no outside to the universe. It is also impossible for us to see the entirety of the universe in all directions, as it is constantly expanding and we are limited by the speed of light. There is still much to be discovered and understood about the universe, and the theories and models used to explain it are constantly evolving.
  • #36
Number Nine said:
Can someone close this thread? It has clearly descended into abject pseudoscience and crankery. The OP is now dismissing LCDM and general relativity entirely.
Goodness. You sound threatened. We certainly wouldn't want to shake the old ivory tower with additional logical discourse. If my posts were illogical as opposed to just being contrary to the status quo conventional wisdom, I suspect you would just ignore them and feel sorry for this "crankey old fart". The fact that you engaged in debate means you must have some serious doubts...and that you are not likely to continue since I pointed this out. Bye
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #37
Is the universe a three-dimensional grid of space-time expanding from a size of zero along each dimension to some undetermined value that may be infinity if nothing interrupts the process of expansion? Spacetime=0 would be that singularity from which the Big Bang is said to have emerged, or does the universe emerge from a condition independent of space-time?

If existence cannot come from non-existence, but the space-time universe has a definite beginning, then existence must be independent of space-time. Existence may therefore be possible before time and beyond space, having none of the qualities contingent on either space or time. We may understand what such an existence is by simply knowing what it cannot be, by what space-time contingent qualities it may not possess.

Primordial existence (as we may call it) cannot have either size or shape; it cannot have location, neither inside (substance) nor outside (number, multiplicity). All such qualities are contingent on space-time. Primordial existence also cannot have any change in its essential nature, including that it can have no beginning nor end. If it is, as it must necessarily be, then it cannot cease to be. Furthermore, although it must incorporate the potential from which our universe arises, and perhaps from which countless other universes arise, it must nonetheless remain an undiminished initial condition from which such universes arise. All this is defined by the very nature of existence independent of space-time.

The standard cosmological model is consistent with this understanding of primordial existence, and it is quite reasonable to argue that something unchanging must ultimately be the source and initial condition of all space-time universes.

Samm
 
  • #38
Locked pending moderation.

Number Nine said:
Can someone close this thread? It has clearly descended into abject pseudoscience and crankery. The OP is now dismissing LCDM and general relativity entirely.
When a thread turns into nonsense like this, please hit the report button so we can stop it.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
76
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
994
  • Cosmology
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top