Need help understanding logarithmic properties

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter daigo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic Properties
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the properties of logarithms, particularly the relationship between logarithmic and exponential functions. Participants explore the implications of different bases in logarithmic expressions and seek clarification on how these properties apply in various contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that 10^log(4x) = 4x because log(4x) represents the exponent to which 10 must be raised to yield 4x.
  • Others propose that the same principle applies to any base, stating that for a logarithm with base 'a', a^(log_a(x)) = x holds true.
  • A participant provides a formula for changing the base of logarithms, suggesting that log_a(x) can be expressed in terms of natural logarithms or logarithms of another base.
  • Some contributions emphasize the inverse relationship between logarithmic and exponential functions, with examples illustrating this concept.
  • A participant points out a potential error in a previous example regarding the value of 10^2, highlighting the importance of accuracy in mathematical expressions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the fundamental properties of logarithms and their relationship to exponentiation. However, there are varying interpretations and clarifications regarding specific examples and the application of these properties across different bases, indicating that the discussion remains somewhat unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of using different bases in logarithmic expressions and how that affects the equations presented. There are also unresolved issues regarding the accuracy of specific numerical examples.

daigo
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Okay, so in class I learned that:

10^log(4x) = 4x

But I don't understand why.

I get that a log without a subscript is considered base 10, so:

10^y = 4x

Is the way to understand "log(4x)", right?

What if the problem was a different base? Would the "10" coefficient and 'log' in the original problem disappear also? If not, what coefficient would it have to be to match the base log in order for those to disappear?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
daigo said:
Okay, so in class I learned that:

10^log(4x) = 4x

But I don't understand why.
Well, log(4x) is the power that you raise 10 to in order to get 4x.

And then you do it ... you raise 10 to that power ... so that 10^log(4x) = 4x.

In other words, log(4x) is some quantity that IF you raised 10 to that power, you'd get 4x. And then you raise 10 to that power.

A more sophisticated way of understanding this is that taking a log (with respect to some base) and raising that base to a power, are operations that are inverse to one another.

Keep doing problems, this will become clear with practice.

daigo said:
What if the problem was a different base? Would the "10" coefficient and 'log' in the original problem disappear also? If not, what coefficient would it have to be to match the base log in order for those to disappear?

It has to be the same base. So 3^(log_3(x)) = x

where log_3 is the base-3 logarithm.

Because log_3(x) is the power you'd have to raise 3 to in order to get x; and then you raise 3 to that power, so you get x.
 
SteveL27 said:
It has to be the same base. So 3^(log_3(x)) = x

where log_3 is the base-3 logarithm.

Because log_3(x) is the power you'd have to raise 3 to in order to get x; and then you raise 3 to that power, so you get x.
Thanks, this part is what actually helped me understand it after plugging in values:

3^(log_3(x)) = x

3^(log_3(9)) = 9

3^(log_3(9) = [3^?=9]) = 9
3^(log_3(9) = 2) = 9
3^2 = 9
9 = 9
 
hi daigo! :smile:

you seem to have difficulty in understanding equations :redface:

some equations are definitions, and you just have to learn them

here's a formula that may help in this case, and is easy to visualise and remember …

##\log_ax = \frac{\log x}{\log a} = \frac{ln(x)}{ln(a)} = \frac{\log_bx}{\log_ba}## for any bases a and b :wink:

(and, as you know, alogax = x by definition)
 
If it helps, think about the log function as what it is - the inverse of exponentiation, by that I mean;
if we define [itex]f(x)=10^x[/itex], then [itex]log(x)=f^{-1}(x)[/itex], and by the definition of an inverse [itex]f^{-1}(f(x)) = x[/itex]

To give you a few examples take;
[itex]f(2) = 10^2 = 1000[/itex]
so [itex]log(1000) = f^{-1}(1000) = 2[/itex]

[itex]f(3.5) = 10^{3.5} = 3162.28[/itex]
so [itex]log(3162.28) = f^{-1}(3162.28) = 3.5[/itex]

When I started learning about logs understanding that it's just an inverse is what got it to 'click' for me. It's then easy to remember the things like log[a b] = log[a]log since they just come straight from the fact that 10^a 10^b = 10^(a+b)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For any positive number, a, [itex]log_a(a^x)= x[/itex] and [itex]a^{log_a(x)}= x[/itex]. Those essentially follow from the fact that "[itex]log_a(x)[/itex]" and "a^x[/itex] are inverse functions.
 
genericusrnme said:
If it helps, think about the log function as what it is - the inverse of exponentiation, by that I mean;
if we define [itex]f(x)=10^x[/itex], then [itex]log(x)=f^{-1}(x)[/itex], and by the definition of an inverse [itex]f^{-1}(f(x)) = x[/itex]

To give you a few examples take;
[itex]f(2) = 10^2 = 1000[/itex]
so [itex]log(1000) = f^{-1}(1000) = 2[/itex]
I'm sure this was a typo but [itex]10^2= 100[/itex], not 1000.

[itex]f(3.5) = 10^{3.5} = 3162.28[/itex]
so [itex]log(3162.28) = f^{-1}(3162.28) = 3.5[/itex]

When I started learning about logs understanding that it's just an inverse is what got it to 'click' for me. It's then easy to remember the things like log[a b] = log[a]log since they just come straight from the fact that 10^a 10^b = 10^(a+b)
 
HallsofIvy said:
I'm sure this was a typo but [itex]10^2= 100[/itex], not 1000.

yes haha, I was pretty tired when I typed that
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K