Need help understanding the pushforward

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Identity
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical concepts of pushforward and pullback in the context of smooth manifolds. Participants explore the definitions and implications of the functions F^* and F_{*p}, focusing on their roles in mapping functions and tangent vectors between manifolds. The scope includes theoretical aspects of differential geometry and the behavior of tangent vectors in relation to smooth functions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that F^* maps a function f on C^\infty(F(p)) to f \circ F on C^\infty(p), while questioning how F_{*p} operates on tangent vectors.
  • One participant asserts that X is a tangent vector in T_pM, and F_{*p}(X) should be an element of T_{F(p)}N, requiring evaluation at smooth germs at F(p).
  • Another participant explains that F_{*p} takes a vector X at p and sends it to a vector F_{*p}X at F(p), with the action on a germ f at F(p) being defined by (F_{*p}X)(f) = X(F^*f).
  • Several participants express confusion regarding the term 'germ', with one providing a definition related to local topological structures and equivalence relations of functions.
  • One participant emphasizes that the f in the expression [F_{*p}(X)](f) serves as a placeholder, indicating that the f on the left and right sides of the equation do not represent functions with the same germs.
  • Another participant suggests that the f in both instances should be understood as functions in C^\infty(F(p)), reinforcing the need for consistency in the context of the equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the definitions and implications of the pushforward and pullback, indicating that there is no consensus on the clarity of these concepts. Some participants agree on the definitions, while others remain confused about specific terms and their applications.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of the term 'germ' and the implications of function composition in the context of tangent vectors. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of the notation used in the definitions.

Identity
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
In my notes, the following two functions are defined:

Suppose M^m and N^n are smooth manifolds, F:M \to N is smooth and p \in M. We define:
F^*:C^\infty (F(p)) \to C^\infty (p)\ ,\ F^*(f) = f \circ F
F_{*p}: T_pM \to T_{F(p)}N\ ,\ [F_{*p}(X)](f) = X(F^*f) = X(f \circ F)

I understand the first function, F^*; it maps f, a function on C^\infty(F(p)), to f \circ F, a function on C^\infty(p).

However, I don't understand the second one, F_{*p}. Since X(f) \in T_pM, it follows that f \in C^\infty (p). But then how is
[F_{*p}(X)](f) = X(F^*f)
defined? After all, in the definition of F_{*p}(X), f is a function on C^\infty (p), not C^\infty(F(p)), so how can we evaluate F^*f?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
X(f) isn't in TpM -- X is.

F_\ast takes X to F_\ast(X). The question now is, what is F_\ast(X)? We want it to be an element of TF(p)N, i.e., it should be a point derivation at F(p) on N, i.e., you need to know how to evaluate Fp(X) at smooth germ f at F(p).
 
So F*p takes a vector X at p (derivation on the germs of smooth function at p) and sends it to a vector F*pX at F(p) (derivation on the germs of smooth function at F(p)). So what is this vector F*pX then? How does it act on a germ f at F(p)? This is what the formula is telling you: it says (F*pX)(f) is just X(F*f). And this makes sense, since F*f =f o F is indeed a germ of functions at p.
 
Sorry, I've never heard of the term 'germ' before, can you explain please?
 
Identity said:
Sorry, I've never heard of the term 'germ' before, can you explain please?

A germ is essentially just a local topological structure.
 
Identity said:
In my notes, the following two functions are defined:

Suppose M^m and N^n are smooth manifolds, F:M \to N is smooth and p \in M. We define:
F^*:C^\infty (F(p)) \to C^\infty (p)\ ,\ F^*(f) = f \circ F
F_{*p}: T_pM \to T_{F(p)}N\ ,\ [F_{*p}(X)](f) = X(F^*f) = X(f \circ F)

I understand the first function, F^*; it maps f, a function on C^\infty(F(p)), to f \circ F, a function on C^\infty(p).

However, I don't understand the second one, F_{*p}. Since X(f) \in T_pM, it follows that f \in C^\infty (p). But then how is
[F_{*p}(X)](f) = X(F^*f)
defined? After all, in the definition of F_{*p}(X), f is a function on C^\infty (p), not C^\infty(F(p)), so how can we evaluate F^*f?

Analytically, a tangent vector at a point,p, on a manifold is a linear operator that acts on differentiable functions defined in an open neighborhood of p. A function,g, on N composed with F is a function on M. So a tangent vector at p now acts on the composition of g with F. But this may also be viewed at an action on g at F(p).
 
Thanks everyone :)
 
Identity said:
Sorry, I've never heard of the term 'germ' before, can you explain please?

I assumed that by C^{\infty}(p) you mean the set of real-valued functions f that are defined and smooth on some neighborhood U of p, modulo the equivalence relations according to which f~g iff f and g coincide on some small nbhd of p.

If so, then the elements of C^{\infty}(p) are called germs of smooth functions.
 
Just to make sure I've got it, in

[F_{*p}(X)](f) = X(f\circ F)
f is kind of placeholder, in the sense that the f on the LHS is an arbitrary function in C^\infty(p) and the f on the RHS is an arbitrary function in C^\infty (F(p))So on the left and right sides of the equation, f does not represent functions with the same germs. I think this is where I got confused.
 
  • #10
Identity said:
Just to make sure I've got it, in

[F_{*p}(X)](f) = X(f\circ F)
f is kind of placeholder, in the sense that the f on the LHS is an arbitrary function in C^\infty(p) and the f on the RHS is an arbitrary function in C^\infty (F(p))

The f in the LHS is the same as the f in the RHS, and in both case, it is a function in C^\infty (F(p)). Indeed, it better be so that f o F is in C^\infty(p) so that X(f o F) makes sense!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K