Questions about the differential

  • Thread starter Thread starter orion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differential
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding two definitions of the differential in the context of differential geometry. The first definition describes the differential as a linear functional on the tangent space, while the second involves a pushforward associated with a map between manifolds. Participants seek to reconcile these definitions and clarify the roles of the functions involved, particularly the relationship between the functions and the tangent spaces. The conversation also touches on notation differences and the conceptual understanding of how tangent vectors are mapped between spaces. Ultimately, the participants aim to clarify the equivalence of the two definitions and the implications for understanding differentials in manifold theory.
  • #31
be aware Lavinia is talking about something slightly different from a map M-->Tp(M). She is talking about maps M-->T(M), without the fixed subscript p.

I.e. a vector field on M is a map v:M-->T(M) such that for each p in M, v(p) belongs to Tp(M). So the p is varying in a vector field.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Thanks, everyone. That clears up a lot of issues.

I actually did come across the exponential map in one set of notes I found on the internet, but I put it aside until I get the basics down.

lavinia, I neglected to thank you for your post earlier. Thanks.
 
  • #33
Fredrik said:
I don't think we have discussed maps like that. If M is equipped with a metric, then the "exponential map" at p takes an arbitrary ##v\in T_pM## to ##\gamma(1)\in M##, where ##\gamma## is the unique geodesic through p whose tangent vector at p is v. I doubt that the exponential map is always invertible, but I would guess that if it isn't, it probably has a restriction that's invertible.

The exponential map is always locally invertible. Its differential is non-singular at the origin of the tangent space being exponentiated.

The example of the sphere that Mathwonk described shows that the exponential map can have singularities and in general it does. The study of its singularities - so called conjugate points - is the subject of Morse Theory.

In some cases, the exponential map can have no singularities but still not be invertible. This is true for instance of compact flat Riemannian manifolds since on them, the Riemann curvature tensor is identically zero so there are no conjugate points.For instance, for the flat torus, the exponential map is a covering projection.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
572
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K