Need help with a couple of BVP's.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grogs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Couple
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving boundary value problems (BVPs) related to the 1-D Heat Equation and steady-state heat conduction in a 2-D square plate. The first problem involves the equation k \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} with boundary conditions u(0, t) = 0 and u(L, t) = 0, and initial conditions that present challenges in applying Fourier series due to discontinuities. The second problem addresses the Laplacian \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2} = 0 with specified boundary conditions, leading to a solution of u(x,y) = 5. The necessity of two initial conditions for the heat equation is debated, with the conclusion that the provided initial conditions lead to a unique solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the 1-D Heat Equation and its boundary conditions
  • Familiarity with Fourier series and eigenfunction expansions
  • Knowledge of Laplace's equation in two dimensions
  • Basic concepts of boundary value problems (BVPs)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Fourier sine series in solving boundary value problems
  • Learn about half-range expansions and their use in initial condition adjustments
  • Explore the implications of discontinuities in boundary conditions on solution uniqueness
  • Investigate the relationship between initial conditions and the order of differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students focusing on heat transfer, boundary value problems, and differential equations.

Grogs
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
I've got a couple of BVP's I'm working on that are giving me some problems. First, I'm asked to solve the 1-D Heat Equation:

k \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial t}

in a thin rod of length L subject to the following:

BC1) u(0, t) = 0
BC2) u(L, t) = 0
IC) 2 different problems. For the first, u(x,0) = 1 - 2 cos(\frac{9 \pi x}{L}). For the second, u(x,0) = 3 cos(\frac{9 \pi x}{2 L}).

I can separate this problem into:

\frac{X''}{X} = \frac{T'}{k T} = - \lambda

easily enough and apply the 2 BC's to get:

u_{n} (x,t) = A_{n} \sin(\frac{n \pi x}{L}) \exp(\frac{-k n^2 \pi^2 t}{L}) , n=1,2,3,...

My problem is with applying the Initial condition and solving for u(x,t):

u(x,t) = \sum \limits_{n=1} ^ {\infty} A_{n} \sin(\frac{n \pi x}{L}) = IC

My book shows me how to do a half-range expansion here, but according to my professor, I shouldn't need to. He even sent us an e-mail changing one of the IC's "so it would be an eigenfunction." How do I get there from here? Is there some easy trig identity to convert those IC's to a sin function I'm just missing?My 2nd question involves steady state heat conduction in a 2-D square plate of side L:

\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2} = 0

Subject To:

BC1) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = 0 at x = 0
BC2) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = 0 at x = L
BC3) \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = 0 at y = 0
BC4) u(x,L) = 5

I separate the Laplacian into:

\frac{X''}{X} = \frac{-Y'}{Y} = - \lambda

and solve using the first 3 BC's, I get X = c_{1} and Y = c_{4} for \lambda = 0 and

<br /> X(x) = c_{2} \sin(\frac{n \pi x}{L})

Y(y) = c_{4} \cosh(\frac{n \pi y}{L})

for \lambda &gt; 0.

Using superposition, I end up with:

u(x,y) = A_{0} + \sum \limits_{n=1} ^ {\infty} A_{n} \sin(\frac{n \pi x}{L}) \cosh(\frac{n \pi y}{L})

When I apply the final BC, u(x,L) = 5, I end up with a solution of u(x,y) = 5. I guess I'm just looking for some sanity checking here. I can certainly see how u = 5 works here, but is it the only solution?

Thanks in advance,

Grogs
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Grogs said:
I've got a couple of BVP's I'm working on that are giving me some problems. First, I'm asked to solve the 1-D Heat Equation:

k \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial t}

in a thin rod of length L subject to the following:

BC1) u(0, t) = 0
BC2) u(L, t) = 0
IC) 2 different problems. For the first, u(x,0) = 1 - 2 cos(\frac{9 \pi x}{L}). For the second, u(x,0) = 3 cos(\frac{9 \pi x}{2 L}).

I can separate this problem into:

\frac{X&#039;&#039;}{X} = \frac{T&#039;}{k T} = - \lambda

easily enough and apply the 2 BC's to get:

u_{n} (x,t) = A_{n} \sin(\frac{n \pi x}{L}) \exp(\frac{-k n^2 \pi^2 t}{L}) , n=1,2,3,...

My problem is with applying the Initial condition and solving for u(x,t):

u(x,t) = \sum \limits_{n=1} ^ {\infty} A_{n} \sin(\frac{n \pi x}{L}) = IC

That should be a sum above, it's just not showing up for some reason.
(To get the sigma to show use \sum with a small "s".)
For your first problem, there is a difficulty with your initial conditions: you don't have enough! Since the equation is second order in t, you need two initial conditions. Perhaps you were also told that u_t(x,0)= 0? That is, that the thin rod was deformed to the given initial position and then released "from rest".
The "complication" is that, since u= 0 at both endpoints, you have written u(x,t) as a sine series in x which is always an odd function by your initial conditions are even functions. That isn't really a problem since your interval is from 0 to L but notice that, according to the first initial condition, u(0, 0)= 1- 2cos(0)= -1 and for the second initial condition, u(0,0)= 3cos(0)= 3, while, according to the boundary conditions, u(0,0)= u(0,t)= 0! You necessarily have a discontinuity at the boundary points.

My book shows me how to do a half-range expansion here, but according to my professor, I shouldn't need to. He even sent us an e-mail changing one of the IC's "so it would be an eigenfunction." How do I get there from here? Is there some easy trig identity to convert those IC's to a sin function I'm just missing

My 2nd question involves steady state heat conduction in a 2-D square plate of side L:

\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2} = 0

Subject To:

BC1) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = 0 at x = 0
BC2) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = 0 at x = L
BC3) \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = 0 at y = 0
BC4) u(x,L) = 5

I separate the Laplacian into:

\frac{X&#039;&#039;}{X} = \frac{-Y&#039;}{Y} = - \lambda

and solve using the first 3 BC's, I get X = c_{1} and Y = c_{4} for \lambda = 0 and

<br /> X(x) = c_{2} \sin(\frac{n \pi x}{L})

Y(y) = c_{4} \cosh(\frac{n \pi y}{L})

for \lambda &gt; 0.

Using superposition, I end up with:

u(x,y) = A_{0} + \Sum \limits_{n=1} ^ {\infty} A_{n} \sin(\frac{n \pi x}{L}) \cosh(\frac{n \pi y}{L})

That should be a sum above, it's just not showing up for some reason.

When I apply the final BC, u(x,L) = 5, I end up with a solution of u(x,y) = 5. I guess I'm just looking for some sanity checking here. I can certainly see how u = 5 works here, but is it the only solution?

Thanks in advance,

Grogs
Again, you can't expect the solution to be continues at y= L because the initial conditions aren't. Yes u(x,y)= 5 is the only solution.
 
Halls, thanks for the reply.

HallsofIvy said:
(To get the sigma to show use \sum with a small "s".)
For your first problem, there is a difficulty with your initial conditions: you don't have enough! Since the equation is second order in t, you need two initial conditions. Perhaps you were also told that u_t(x,0)= 0? That is, that the thin rod was deformed to the given initial position and then released "from rest".

I'm not sure where you're getting that. This is the heat equation (u = temperature,) not the wave equation. It's 1st order in t -> 1 IC required. The 2 IC's I posted are for 2 different problems where everything is the same, save for the IC's.

HallsofIvy said:
The "complication" is that, since u= 0 at both endpoints, you have written u(x,t) as a sine series in x which is always an odd function by your initial conditions are even functions. That isn't really a problem since your interval is from 0 to L but notice that, according to the first initial condition, u(0, 0)= 1- 2cos(0)= -1 and for the second initial condition, u(0,0)= 3cos(0)= 3, while, according to the boundary conditions, u(0,0)= u(0,t)= 0! You necessarily have a discontinuity at the boundary points.

Hmm, interesting. I see where you're coming from with the cosines. There's a mathematical discontinuity between 2 cos(0) and 0 at x = 0. Looking at that leads me to believe there's no way this problem can be solved in the same way as an IC of say, 3 \sin(\frac{5 \pi x}{L}. So would using the half-range expression:

A_{n} = \frac{2}{L} \int \limits_{0} ^ {L} sin(\frac{n \pi x}{L}) f(x) dx

where f(x) is the IC be the only way to find u(x,y) in this case?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
969