A Need help with an integral -- How to integrate velocity squared?

Click For Summary
The integral of velocity squared, expressed as ∫(dot x)² dt, cannot be solved without knowing the function x(t) or its derivative dot x(t). The discussion highlights that using the chain rule can transform the integral, but this approach requires a first-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) relationship between dot x and x. In the context of a second-order nonlinear ODE, where dot x is not explicitly defined in terms of x, the integral remains unsolvable. The conversation also notes that the energy dissipation in the system can be described by the derivative of a specific energy term, indicating that the system loses energy over time. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for addressing the integral problem effectively.
Tomder
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Problem with a implicit function integral.
The integral is this one:

##\int (\dot x)^2 \, dt,##

With ##x=x(t). ##

I don't know how to solve that integral and I haven't find nothing to read about on how to proceed with this kind of (implicit function?) integrals without having the initial function.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This:
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=integral+(y'(x))^2+dx+=
suggests that it is likely there exists no closed form for the integral.

What's also suspicious: if you take standard units, then you ask for a quantity measured in ##\dfrac{m^2}{s}## and I cannot think of where this might make sense.
 
Last edited:
Tomder said:
TL;DR Summary: Problem with a implicit function integral.

The integral is this one:

##\int (\dot x)^2 \, dt,##

With ##x=x(t). ##

I don't know how to solve that integral and I haven't find nothing to read about on how to proceed with this kind of (implicit function?) integrals without having the initial function.

By the chain rule: \int \dot x^2\,dt = \int \dot x \frac{dx}{dt}\,dt = \int \dot x \,dx. But this only helps you if you know \dot x in terms of x, ie. your system satisfies a first order ODE. But you originally asked this question in the context of a second-order nonlinear ODE <br /> \ddot x = -f(x) - k\dot x. In that case you do not have \dot x in terms of x; you have \ddot x in terms of x and \dot x. You can't evaluate\int \dot x^2 \,dt unless you already know x(t) and \dot x(t). What you can say is that <br /> \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac12 \dot x^2 + \int f(x)\,dx \right) = -k\dot x^2 \leq 0, ie. the system dissipates energy.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff, PeroK, Tomder and 1 other person
pasmith said:
By the chain rule: \int \dot x^2\,dt = \int \dot x \frac{dx}{dt}\,dt = \int \dot x \,dx. But this only helps you if you know \dot x in terms of x, ie. your system satisfies a first order ODE. But you originally asked this question in the context of a second-order nonlinear ODE <br /> \ddot x = -f(x) - k\dot x. In that case you do not have \dot x in terms of x; you have \ddot x in terms of x and \dot x. You can't evaluate\int \dot x^2 \,dt unless you already know x(t) and \dot x(t). What you can say is that <br /> \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac12 \dot x^2 + \int f(x)\,dx \right) = -k\dot x^2 \leq 0, ie. the system dissipates energy.
Thanks, I thought about the same process but was unsure of its veracity, guess I‘ll try to work in my system with the idea of energy dissipation term. Thank you very much for your answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K