Need help with an integral -- How to integrate velocity squared?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of interest is ##\int (\dot x)^2 \, dt##, where ##x=x(t)##. The discussion reveals that solving this integral is not feasible without knowing the function ##x(t)## or its derivative ##\dot x(t)##. The context involves a second-order nonlinear ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by ##\ddot x = -f(x) - k\dot x##, indicating that the integral cannot be evaluated without prior knowledge of the system's behavior. The energy dissipation aspect is highlighted, showing that the system loses energy over time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), specifically second-order nonlinear ODEs.
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus.
  • Knowledge of energy dissipation in dynamic systems.
  • Ability to interpret integrals involving implicit functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of second-order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs).
  • Learn about energy conservation and dissipation in mechanical systems.
  • Explore techniques for solving implicit function integrals.
  • Investigate numerical methods for approximating solutions to ODEs when closed forms are unavailable.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with dynamic systems, particularly those dealing with nonlinear ordinary differential equations and energy dissipation analysis.

Tomder
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Problem with a implicit function integral.
The integral is this one:

##\int (\dot x)^2 \, dt,##

With ##x=x(t). ##

I don't know how to solve that integral and I haven't find nothing to read about on how to proceed with this kind of (implicit function?) integrals without having the initial function.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This:
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=integral+(y'(x))^2+dx+=
suggests that it is likely there exists no closed form for the integral.

What's also suspicious: if you take standard units, then you ask for a quantity measured in ##\dfrac{m^2}{s}## and I cannot think of where this might make sense.
 
Last edited:
Tomder said:
TL;DR Summary: Problem with a implicit function integral.

The integral is this one:

##\int (\dot x)^2 \, dt,##

With ##x=x(t). ##

I don't know how to solve that integral and I haven't find nothing to read about on how to proceed with this kind of (implicit function?) integrals without having the initial function.

By the chain rule: \int \dot x^2\,dt = \int \dot x \frac{dx}{dt}\,dt = \int \dot x \,dx. But this only helps you if you know \dot x in terms of x, ie. your system satisfies a first order ODE. But you originally asked this question in the context of a second-order nonlinear ODE <br /> \ddot x = -f(x) - k\dot x. In that case you do not have \dot x in terms of x; you have \ddot x in terms of x and \dot x. You can't evaluate\int \dot x^2 \,dt unless you already know x(t) and \dot x(t). What you can say is that <br /> \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac12 \dot x^2 + \int f(x)\,dx \right) = -k\dot x^2 \leq 0, ie. the system dissipates energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff, PeroK, Tomder and 1 other person
pasmith said:
By the chain rule: \int \dot x^2\,dt = \int \dot x \frac{dx}{dt}\,dt = \int \dot x \,dx. But this only helps you if you know \dot x in terms of x, ie. your system satisfies a first order ODE. But you originally asked this question in the context of a second-order nonlinear ODE <br /> \ddot x = -f(x) - k\dot x. In that case you do not have \dot x in terms of x; you have \ddot x in terms of x and \dot x. You can't evaluate\int \dot x^2 \,dt unless you already know x(t) and \dot x(t). What you can say is that <br /> \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac12 \dot x^2 + \int f(x)\,dx \right) = -k\dot x^2 \leq 0, ie. the system dissipates energy.
Thanks, I thought about the same process but was unsure of its veracity, guess I‘ll try to work in my system with the idea of energy dissipation term. Thank you very much for your answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K