Need help with an integral -- How to integrate velocity squared?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the expression ##\int (\dot x)^2 \, dt##, where ##x=x(t)##. Participants explore the challenges associated with integrating this expression, particularly in the context of implicit functions and second-order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to solve the integral ##\int (\dot x)^2 \, dt## and notes a lack of resources on integrating such implicit function integrals without the initial function.
  • Another participant references a link suggesting that there may not be a closed form for the integral, raising concerns about the physical interpretation of the resulting quantity measured in ##\dfrac{m^2}{s}##.
  • A participant discusses the application of the chain rule to rewrite the integral as ##\int \dot x \,dx##, but notes that this approach requires knowing ##\dot x## in terms of ##x##, which is not possible in the context of a second-order nonlinear ODE.
  • The same participant explains that without knowing ##x(t)## and ##\dot x(t)##, evaluating the integral is not feasible, but mentions that energy dissipation can be expressed through a related derivative involving the system's dynamics.
  • Another participant acknowledges the validity of the chain rule approach and indicates they will consider the energy dissipation term in their analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the challenges of integrating the expression without additional information about the function ##x(t)##. However, there is no consensus on the existence of a closed form for the integral or its physical implications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the dependence on the specific form of the function ##x(t)## and the unresolved nature of the integral in the context of the given ODE.

Tomder
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Problem with a implicit function integral.
The integral is this one:

##\int (\dot x)^2 \, dt,##

With ##x=x(t). ##

I don't know how to solve that integral and I haven't find nothing to read about on how to proceed with this kind of (implicit function?) integrals without having the initial function.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This:
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=integral+(y'(x))^2+dx+=
suggests that it is likely there exists no closed form for the integral.

What's also suspicious: if you take standard units, then you ask for a quantity measured in ##\dfrac{m^2}{s}## and I cannot think of where this might make sense.
 
Last edited:
Tomder said:
TL;DR Summary: Problem with a implicit function integral.

The integral is this one:

##\int (\dot x)^2 \, dt,##

With ##x=x(t). ##

I don't know how to solve that integral and I haven't find nothing to read about on how to proceed with this kind of (implicit function?) integrals without having the initial function.

By the chain rule: \int \dot x^2\,dt = \int \dot x \frac{dx}{dt}\,dt = \int \dot x \,dx. But this only helps you if you know \dot x in terms of x, ie. your system satisfies a first order ODE. But you originally asked this question in the context of a second-order nonlinear ODE <br /> \ddot x = -f(x) - k\dot x. In that case you do not have \dot x in terms of x; you have \ddot x in terms of x and \dot x. You can't evaluate\int \dot x^2 \,dt unless you already know x(t) and \dot x(t). What you can say is that <br /> \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac12 \dot x^2 + \int f(x)\,dx \right) = -k\dot x^2 \leq 0, ie. the system dissipates energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff, PeroK, Tomder and 1 other person
pasmith said:
By the chain rule: \int \dot x^2\,dt = \int \dot x \frac{dx}{dt}\,dt = \int \dot x \,dx. But this only helps you if you know \dot x in terms of x, ie. your system satisfies a first order ODE. But you originally asked this question in the context of a second-order nonlinear ODE <br /> \ddot x = -f(x) - k\dot x. In that case you do not have \dot x in terms of x; you have \ddot x in terms of x and \dot x. You can't evaluate\int \dot x^2 \,dt unless you already know x(t) and \dot x(t). What you can say is that <br /> \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac12 \dot x^2 + \int f(x)\,dx \right) = -k\dot x^2 \leq 0, ie. the system dissipates energy.
Thanks, I thought about the same process but was unsure of its veracity, guess I‘ll try to work in my system with the idea of energy dissipation term. Thank you very much for your answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K