MHB Need help with parallelogram proof

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving a relationship involving the sides of a parallelogram using similar triangles. The user identifies that opposite sides and angles of a parallelogram are congruent, establishing similarity between triangles WYS and STW. However, confusion arises regarding the proportional relationships SX x YW = SV x WT, as the user struggles to match corresponding parts of the triangles. A suggestion is made to focus on the triangles SXY and SVT instead, emphasizing the importance of using the properties of the parallelogram. Clarification on these relationships is sought to solidify the proof.
sc00t34
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, we are learning about similar triangles and this was a problem. So I know that opposite sides of a parallelogram are congruent as are opposite angles, so I can establish similarity with triangles WYS and STW, but I don't understand how that proves SX x YW = SV x WT because the proportions don't match up when I compare similar triangles for their corresponding parts.

Any help is greatly appreciated... am I on the right track?

This is what I have so far. See attached image.

Statement Reason

1. WYST is Parallelogram. 1. Given
2. angle Y and angle T are congruent. 2. Def of parallelogram, opposite angles congruent.
3. WT and YS congruent, WY and TS congruent. 3. Def of parallelogram, opposite sides congruent.
4. WYS and STW are similar. 4. SAS
?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0700 copy.jpg
    IMG_0700 copy.jpg
    12.7 KB · Views: 139
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The similar triangles that you need to look at are $SXY$ and $SVT$. Then use the fact that opposite sides of the parallelogram are equal.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top