MHB Need help with transforming one PDE to another

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kane1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pde
Kane1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
For quick reference if you have the text, the question is from "Applied Partial Differential Equations" by J. David Logan. Section 1.9 #4
Show that the equation $$u_{tt} - c^2 u_{xx} + au_t + bu_x + du = f(x,t)$$
can be transformed into an equation of the form
$$w_{\xi\tau} + kw = g(\xi,\tau), w = w(\xi,\tau)$$
by first making the transformation $$\xi = x - ct, \tau = x + ct$$ and then letting $$u = w\exp{\alpha\xi + \beta\tau}$$ for some alpha and beta

I'm completely stumped at how to solve this problem, but I do not expect a solution, only a way to begin so I can get used to problems like these in general.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to transform first and second order derivatives under the change of variables

$\xi = x - ct$ and $\tau = x+ct$?
 
I honestly have no idea. I know that you have to relate $u(x,t)$ with $w(\xi,\tau)$ and then use the chain rule. If you could help me with finding one derivative, like transforming the term $u_t$ I will try the others on my own. Thank you for your reply
 
Here's the chain rule from Calc 3 (well, Calc 3 in US universities)

$u_t = u_{\tau} \tau_t + u_{\xi} \xi_t$

so if $\tau$ and $\xi$ are defined above, this becomes

$u_t = cu_{\tau} - c u_{\xi}$.

There are similar expressions for $u_x$, $u_{tt}$, $u_{tx}$ and $u_{xx}$.
 
Danny said:
Here's the chain rule from Calc 3 (well, Calc 3 in US universities)

$u_t = u_{\tau} \tau_t + u_{\xi} \xi_t$

so if $\tau$ and $\xi$ are defined above, this becomes

$u_t = cu_{\tau} - c u_{\xi}$.

There are similar expressions for $u_x$, $u_{tt}$, $u_{tx}$ and $u_{xx}$.

Ah, I have seen that before in another class! I think I understand now. Thank you, thank you!
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K