How Does Dropping Clay Affect a Potter's Wheel's Angular Speed?

Click For Summary
A potter's wheel with a rotational inertia of 6.40 kg*m^2 spins at 19.0 rpm before a 2.80 kg lump of clay is dropped onto it. The discussion centers on using angular momentum conservation to analyze the effect of the clay on the wheel's angular speed. Participants emphasize that the total angular momentum remains constant, meaning the initial angular momentum equals the final angular momentum after the clay is added. The correct approach is to calculate the initial angular momentum and then set it equal to the final angular momentum, rather than adding them together. Clarity is provided on using the given moment of inertia instead of recalculating it for the disk.
math34
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A potter's wheel, with rotational inertia 6.40 kg * m^2, is spinning freely at 19.0 rpm. The potter drops a 2.80 kg lump of clay onto the wheel, where it sticks a distance of 47.0 cm from the rotation axis.

Homework Equations



I know I need to use angular momentum here, but I am a little confused..

The Attempt at a Solution

conver to SI units:

19 rpm * (2 pi radians/1 revolution) * ( 1 minute / 60 seconds) = 1.99 radians
radius = 0.47 meters
mass = 2.8 kg

I know I need to use angular momentum: L = Iw

and i think this has to do with conservation of momentum but I need some direction.

so the total angular momentum needs to be the sum of the angular momentum before and after the lump is dropped on the wheel,

w(inital)mv^2 + Iw(final)= Iwfirst term being the angular momentum before the drop so we can replace the moment of inertia by mv^2 since it is a disk

second term being after the lump is dropped on the disk

the sum of these is the total angular momentum, is this on the right approach?
something doesn't seem quite right to me..
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
math34 said:

The Attempt at a Solution




conver to SI units:

19 rpm * (2 pi radians/1 revolution) * ( 1 minute / 60 seconds) = 1.99 radians
radius = 0.47 meters
mass = 2.8 kg

I know I need to use angular momentum: L = Iw

and i think this has to do with conservation of momentum but I need some direction.

so the total angular momentum needs to be the sum of the angular momentum before and after the lump is dropped on the wheel,

w(inital)mv^2 + Iw(final)= Iw


first term being the angular momentum before the drop so we can replace the moment of inertia by mv^2 since it is a disk
There are 2 problems with that:
1. They tell you the moment of inertia for the potter's wheel. Just use that value for I, there is no need to calculate it.
2. For future reference: the moment of inertia of a disk is (½)mr2. v is irrelevant.

second term being after the lump is dropped on the disk

the sum of these is the total angular momentum, is this on the right approach?
something doesn't seem quite right to me..
Thanks
It sounds like you are adding the initial angular momentum to the final angular momentum, and calling that "the total angular momentum". It doesn't work that way.

Conservation of angular momentum means that it doesn't change between the initial and final situations. So the equation should look more like this:
Linitial = Lfinal
Either side of the equation can be called the total angular momentum.

As a start, go ahead and calculate what Linitial is.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
11K
Replies
335
Views
15K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K