Need to find a constant in an x-axis equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcdowellmg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for the constant c in the position equation of a particle subjected to a variable force. The position is given as x = 3.0 m + (4.0 m/s)t + ct^2 - (2.6 m/s^3)t^3, and at t = 3.0 s, the force is -36 N. The participants clarify that the acceleration is derived from the second derivative of the position function, and corrections are made regarding the calculations of the derivatives. The correct approach involves using Newton's second law to relate the net force to the acceleration, leading to the equation for c. Ultimately, the calculations reveal that the initial value for c was incorrect due to misinterpretations of the derivatives and the sign of the force.
mcdowellmg
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2.2 kg particle moves along an x axis, being propelled by a variable force directed along that axis. Its position is given by x = 3.0 m + (4.0 m/s)t + ct2 - (2.6 m/s3)t3, with x in meters and t in seconds. The factor c is a constant. At t = 3.0 s, the force on the particle has a magnitude of 36 N and is in the negative direction of the axis. What is c?

Homework Equations



F = m*a

The Attempt at a Solution



I was given the hint: Acceleration is the second time derivative of the position function. The net force is related to the acceleration via Newton's second law.

I tried to take the 2nd derivative of the x equation, but I am not sure if I am doing it right because of all of the m's and m/s's, etc. along with the c and the t's.
I ended up getting 4+c*2t+t^2-7.8t^2 and then 2c-11.6t as my second derivative. (I had 2c-15.6t at first, but I think I had the product rule wrong in the first derivative then...)
I then solved a = 2c - 11.6(3) as 16.364 = 2c - 34.8, because 16.364 is the acceleration I found by dividing 36/2.2 (F/m). That solves for c as 25.58200. Apparently that is wrong, and I don't know why!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the position has a t^3 term, the force must be time dependent. The t^2 term must arise from the constant part of the force, but you must use the t^3 term to isolate that part. The best way to do this is to derive this position function from Newton's law using a time-dependent force.
 
I think that I may have forgotten that the 36 N is negative...which would be -36/2.2...so -16.364 = 2c - 34.8 would give me a different c, which I believe may be correct.
 
mcdowellmg said:

Homework Statement



A 2.2 kg particle moves along an x axis, being propelled by a variable force directed along that axis. Its position is given by x = 3.0 m + (4.0 m/s)t + ct2 - (2.6 m/s3)t3, with x in meters and t in seconds. The factor c is a constant. At t = 3.0 s, the force on the particle has a magnitude of 36 N and is in the negative direction of the axis. What is c?

Homework Equations



F = m*a

The Attempt at a Solution



I was given the hint: Acceleration is the second time derivative of the position function. The net force is related to the acceleration via Newton's second law.

I tried to take the 2nd derivative of the x equation, but I am not sure if I am doing it right because of all of the m's and m/s's, etc. along with the c and the t's.
I ended up getting 4+c*2t+t^2-7.8t^2
I presume you mean you got this as the first derivative- the velocity. Is that "t^2" a typo? It shouldn't be there and its derivartive, 2t, does not appear in your second derivative.

and then 2c-11.6t as my second derivative. (I had 2c-15.6t at first, but I think I had the product rule wrong in the first derivative then...)
No, the derivative of x= 3.0 m + (4.0)t + ct^2 - (2.6)t^3 is dx/dt= 4+ 2ct- 7.8t^2 and the second derivative is d^2x/dt^2= 2\c- 15.6t. 2(7.8)= 15.8. Even if that "t^2" in the first derivative was intended and you included it with "-7.8t^2" to get "-6.8t^2" the dervative would be "-13.6t", not "-11.6t".

I then solved a = 2c - 11.6(3) as 16.364 = 2c - 34.8, because 16.364 is the acceleration I found by dividing 36/2.2 (F/m). That solves for c as 25.58200. Apparently that is wrong, and I don't know why!
You should have 2c- 15.6(3)= 2c- 46.8= (-36/2.2)= -16.36 to two decimal places.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K