Need to prove if x<1 and m>=n then x^m<=x^n

  • Thread starter Thread starter nate9228
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the inequality \( x^m \leq x^n \) under the conditions that \( x \) is in the interval [0, 1] and \( m \) and \( n \) are natural numbers with \( m \geq n \). The original poster expresses difficulty in formulating a proof and seeks assistance in understanding the problem better.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the axioms and theorems that may be applicable to the proof, with some suggesting the need to consider specific cases for \( x = 0 \) and \( x = 1 \). Others propose breaking the problem into cases for \( 0 < x < 1 \) and mention the potential use of induction.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different approaches to the proof, including case analysis and induction. Some participants are clarifying their understanding of the implications of the theorem and questioning the validity of certain statements made during the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of using basic axioms and theorems relevant to natural numbers and real numbers, emphasizing the need to avoid advanced theorems. There is also a recognition of the original poster's flustered state, which may be affecting their ability to engage with the problem.

nate9228
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The topic pretty much says it. x is such that it is greater than or equal to zero but less then or equal to one. m,n are natural numbers such that m is greater than or equal to n. I need to prove that x^m<=x^n. I know this is most likely a pretty simple proof, but I am currently flustered and my mind is not working properly at the moment so nothing is working out for me in regards to the proof.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have nothing of substance to put forth at the moment. So help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the axioms and theorems that you are allowed to use?
 
There's to many to list specifically. This is an entire class about proofs. My best answer to that would be all of the basic axioms for integers, and the corresponding axioms for the reals, especially the ones involving the positive reals and ordering, and all of the basic inequality theorems as well, etc. So basically I am trying to get a good idea of how to do the prove without any advanced theorems I guess, which I doubt are needed anyways, and then apply the theorems/propositions I have to it.
 
Do you see any past theorems and results that could come in handy??
 
Well there's one which says for x>1, x^2<x^3. I'm sure this has something to do with it, but its not general enough to use it directly for x<1 if that makes sense.
 
Alright, so, I gather the theorem is, "For any [itex]x \in \mathbb{R}[/itex], [itex]\left\{m, n\right\} \subseteq \mathbb{N}[/itex], if both [itex]0 \leq x \leq 1[/itex] and [itex]m \geq n[/itex], then [itex]x^m \leq x^n[/itex]."

I'd start by breaking it into cases.

First, consider when [itex]x=0[/itex]. Then, clearly we have our conclusion.

Similar, if we consider only when [itex]x=1[/itex], then we have our conclusion again.

Now, suppose [itex]0 < x < 1[/itex], our final case. From all the calculator computations you've likely done, you probably know that putting a number in this domain to a higher and higher power makes it smaller and smaller, and so we have our conclusion. How can you formalize this? I'd might try induction with the set [itex]\left\{p : x^p < x^{p+1}, \forall p \in \mathbb{N}, x \in \mathbb{R}, 0 < x < 1 \right\}[/itex], but that might be over complicating it or straying off our path; it gives you an idea, though, I hope.
 
Last edited:
Ahh thank you. I was trying to figure out how to try induction but wasn't sure because of having both m and n as variables, but that definitely clears it up. Thanks!
 
But wait a minute, isn't the p statement wrong? For 0<x<1, x^p+1<x^p. That is what I want to prove.
 
nate9228 said:
But wait a minute, isn't the p statement wrong? For 0<x<1, x^p+1<x^p. That is what I want to prove.

haha, yeah, you are correct. I've been meaning to fix that, :}

EDIT: I don't seem to have the ability to edit that reply anymore, :S. Oh well...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K