Negative cosmological constant from string theory

  • #1
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
10,828
3,530

Main Question or Discussion Point

Allegedly, string theory (in it's simplest form) predicts that cosmological constant must be negative (or zero). Can someone explain where does this result come from? A reference would also be welcome.
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,182
346
There is no such "result".
 
  • #3
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
10,828
3,530
There is no such "result".
Not even in older literature? Then how to interpret the statement by Witten
"In fact, classical or not, I don’t know any clear-cut way to get de Sitter space from string theory or M-theory. This last statement is not very surprising given the classical no go theorem. For, in view of the usual problems in stabilizing moduli, it is hard to get de Sitter space in a reliable fashion at the quantum level given that it does not arise classically."
in http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0106109 ?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
  • #4
1,182
346
String theory in AdS is a modern topic.
 
  • #5
haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,299
674
I'm not up to date to all the stringy constructions of backgrounds, but I think the problem you're addressing is deeper: it has to do with supersymmetry. E.g., pure N=1 D=4 supergravity can be constructed in a anti-deSitter background, but not a deSitter background. The reason is that the Jacobi identities of the underlying algebra don't allow for one particular sign of the cosmological constant (corresponding to dS).
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #6
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
10,828
3,530
I'm not up to date to all the stringy constructions of backgrounds, but I think the problem you're addressing is deeper: it has to do with supersymmetry. E.g., pure N=1 D=4 supergravity can be constructed in a anti-deSitter background, but not a deSitter background. The reason is that the Jacobi identities of the underlying algebra don't allow for one particular sign of the cosmological constant (corresponding to dS).
Thanks! Can you give a reference for that?
 
  • #7
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
10,828
3,530
  • #8
1,182
346
Hey, you changed the question from "must be negative" to "must be negative (or zero)". For the record, my answer pertained to the original version.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #9
1,182
346
And you edited comment #3 to add the quote by Witten.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #10
haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,299
674
Thanks! Can you give a reference for that?
See e.g. Freedman& Van Proeyen their sugra textbook, page 251 onward. My supervisor Eric Bergshoeff also published on construction of deSitter sugra on the arxiv, e.g.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.08264

but I haven't read it.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier

Related Threads on Negative cosmological constant from string theory

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top