Network Analysis, Kirchhoff's Laws, changing current source to voltage

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Kirchhoff's laws to analyze a circuit with a current source. The original poster is unsure about including the current source in their loop equations and whether to convert it to a voltage source. Key points emphasize the importance of correctly identifying nodes and branches in the circuit, as well as ensuring all linearly independent equations are included. It is clarified that the current source should be included in the loop for Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and that careful attention must be paid to definitions and polarities in the equations. Ultimately, the poster successfully resolved their issue with the help of the community.
Emo_Jesus
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
The voltage U1, U2 the current I3 and the resistors R1, R2, R3 are given.
a) Write down the equations needed to calculate U3 using Kirchhoffs Laws and Ohms Laws.
b) calculate U3 using the Network-equations
Relevant Equations
Kirchhoffs 1. and 2. Law, U = R*I
I tried setting up 4 equations using Kirchoffs laws, but the current source is throwing me off, as i dont know wether to include it in the loop, and if it would be smart to transform it into a voltage source.
The equations i have so far are:
I1 + I2 + I3 = I(R3)
I(R3) = I1 + I4
I4 = I2 + I3
U1 = U(R1) + U3

I(R3) being the current through R3, I2 through R2, R1 through R1, and I4 being the one going "right" at the knot under R3

Screenshot_2.png


Any help is highly appreciated, thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Emo_Jesus said:
The equations i have so far are:
I1 + I2 + I3 = I(R3)
I(R3) = I1 + I4
I4 = I2 + I3
U1 = U(R1) + U3

I(R3) being the current through R3, I2 through R2, R1 through R1, and I4 being the one going "right" at the knot under R3
This is the wrong approach.

Nodes and branches in the circuit must be identified correctly.
What is a node in an electrical circuit? What is a branch in an electrical circuit?

All linearly independent equations written by using the first and the second Kirchhoff’s laws must be included.
How many linearly independent equations can be written by using the first Kirchhoff’s law? How many linearly independent equations can be written by using the second Kirchhoff’s law?
 
Yes, you include it in the loop for KVL, sort of. It doesn't matter what the circuit element is for KVL you are simply defining the voltages across each and adding them up.

So KVL for the right most loop (clockwise) is simply ##(-U_3) + (U_3 - U_2) + (U_2) = 0##.
You can then substitute using the circuit element definitions. For example ##(U_3-U_2)=R_2 I_{R2} ##.
You don't have to substitute anything for ##U_2##, it is a known value or independent variable.
You can't substitute anything for ##U_3## since the current source circuit element doesn't define it's own voltage, that is one of the things you need to solve for.

KCL is similar, of course, but with nodes instead of loops.

Be very careful with your definitions and polarities. You must be consistent in all of the equations.
 
Thank you both for the Help, i solved it now! :)
 
  • Like
Likes Gavran and DaveE
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K