Neutron cross section in fission

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of neutron cross sections in fission, particularly in the context of control rods in nuclear reactors. Participants explore the relationship between neutron speed, de Broglie wavelength, and the effectiveness of different materials used in control rods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the smaller de Broglie wavelength of fast neutrons affects their interaction with materials like carbon rods, which are used to slow down neutrons for better fission interaction.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that de Broglie wavelength is the sole factor influencing neutron interaction cross sections, citing the existence of fast breeder reactors that do not thermalize neutrons.
  • A third participant notes the complexity and nonlinearity of the relationship between fission cross section and neutron energy, suggesting that simple explanations are inadequate.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the function of control rods, emphasizing their role in neutron absorption and reactor safety, as well as the historical context of early reactor designs using graphite as a moderator.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the factors influencing neutron interactions and the effectiveness of control rods, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of neutron interactions and the various materials used in reactors, but does not resolve the specific assumptions regarding de Broglie wavelength and its impact on neutron cross sections.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
I was reading about control rods in a nuclear reactor. The carbon rods slow down the neutrons so they can interact better and induce fission. Is the reason that they don't interact when raveling fast is this because the have a smaller de broglie wavelength?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:
I was reading about control rods in a nuclear reactor. The carbon rods slow down the neutrons so they can interact better and induce fission. Is the reason that they don't interact when raveling fast is this because the have a smaller de broglie wavelength?

Again, do the "If this is true, then..."

If having a "smaller de broglie wavelength" is all there is affecting the interaction cross section, then why do we have "fast breeder" reactor that does not thermalize the neutrons?

Zz.
 
cragar said:
I was reading about control rods in a nuclear reactor. The carbon rods slow down the neutrons so they can interact better and induce fission. Is the reason that they don't interact when raveling fast is this because the have a smaller de broglie wavelength?

You seem to be mixing different things here.

Control rods are made of certain materials which absorb neutrons:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_rod

Control rods act to increase or decrease the activity inside the reactor by their relative placement inside the fuel elements where the nuclear fission takes place. They are also a safety device which, when fully inserted into the reactor core, will absorb so many neutrons, the fissioning of the fuel stops altogether.

In early reactor designs, the so-called atomic piles, nuclear reactors were crude piles of uranium pellets encased in graphite blocks:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Pile-1

The uranium naturally gave off neutrons as it decayed, which neutrons would then strike other uranium nuclei, causing them to split. In order to increase the likelihood of these free neutrons causing uranium nuclei to fission, the carbon in the graphite served as a moderator to slow the neutrons down.

Other reactors were subsequently built which used heavy water (D2O) to serve as the moderator substance in place of graphite blocks. The heavy water also served to cool the nuclear fuel when the reactor was active and to transmit the heat from the nuclear reaction to other machinery.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K