New approach to stabilize fusion plasmas

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a new approach to stabilize fusion plasmas, focusing on the application of RF power to address instabilities in plasma. Participants explore the mechanisms involved and the implications for fusion research, with references to recent findings from the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight the application of increased RF power to stabilize unstable 'bubbles' in fusion plasmas.
  • One participant expresses enthusiasm for the potential significance of this discovery in the context of scientific advancements in 2019.
  • A participant unfamiliar with the field seeks clarification on the physical mechanisms described, particularly regarding temperature perturbations and their effect on current drive and RF power deposition.
  • Another participant reiterates the explanation of how cooler regions in the plasma, which have higher electrical resistance, may influence the current path and stabilization process through RF power absorption.
  • Reference is made to additional resources that may provide clearer definitions and explanations of the concepts discussed.
  • A related post discusses the collapse of heat in tokamak facilities, linking it to the disordered magnetic fields and their impact on plasma confinement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and interpretation of the mechanisms involved in plasma stabilization. There is no consensus on the clarity of the explanations provided, and some participants seek further clarification on the concepts discussed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects a range of expertise among participants, with some expressing confusion over technical terminology and the implications of the findings. The complexity of the interactions between temperature perturbations, current drive, and RF power is acknowledged but not fully resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in fusion research, plasma physics, and the technical challenges associated with stabilizing fusion plasmas may find this discussion informative.

Engineering news on Phys.org
It's is a bit early to make a final decision for 2019's most important scientific discovery, but for now this gets my vote.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G
This isn't my field, but I like learning about fusion progress. I've got a few questions about what they're saying here. Would someone be kind enough to explain?
https://phys.org/news/2019-01-scientists-stabilizes-fusion-plasmas.html said:
The physical mechanism that PPPL has identified works like this:

  • The temperature perturbations affect the strength of the current drive and the amount of RF power deposited in the islands.
  • The perturbations and their impact on the deposition of power feedback against each other in a complex—or nonlinear—manner.
  • When the feedback combines with the sensitivity of the current drive to temperature perturbations, the efficiency of the stabilization process increases.
  • Furthermore, the improved stabilization is less to likely to be affected by misaligned current drives that fail to hit the center of the island.
What I got out of this--please correct me if I am wrong--is that cooler regions in the plasma have a naturally higher electrical resistance. When they form the current driven through the plasma, to reach and maintain fusion temperatures, avoids them (taking the path of least resistance) and they cool more. But these cooler regions also happen to be more receptive to RF power, which they absorb, causing their temperature to rise and correcting the instability.

Am I on the right track here, or completely misunderstanding this? Thank you.
 
jackwhirl said:
What I got out of this--please correct me if I am wrong--is that cooler regions in the plasma have a naturally higher electrical resistance. When they form the current driven through the plasma, to reach and maintain fusion temperatures, avoids them (taking the path of least resistance) and they cool more. But these cooler regions also happen to be more receptive to RF power, which they absorb, causing their temperature to rise and correcting the instability.
It seems to be something like that. A 'better' (but still not real clear) definition can be found (especially in the last 2 paragraphs) at:
https://phys.org/news/2018-08-higher-plasma-densities-efficient-tokamaks.html

The word choices in both articles makes it hard for us non-specialists to find the actual intent of what is being said.

Cheers,
Tom

p.s. more can be found if you drill down thru the link at the end of each phys.org article. the link I mentioned here was four or five deep from the original post in this thread.
 
Related to the OP

Physicists at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) have proposed the source of the sudden and puzzling collapse of heat that precedes disruptions that can damage doughnut-shaped tokamak fusion facilities.
https://phys.org/news/2022-09-scientists-fusion-energy-sun-stars.html

Researchers traced the collapse to the 3D disordering of the strong magnetic fields that bottle up the hot, charged plasma gas that fuels the reactions. "We proposed a novel way to understand the [disordered] field lines, which was usually ignored or poorly modeled in the previous studies," said Min-Gu Yoo, a post-doctoral researcher at PPPL and lead author of a Physics of Plasmas paper selected as an editor's pick together with a figure placed on the cover of the July issue. Yoo has since become a staff scientist at General Atomics in San Diego.

The strong magnetic fields substitute in fusion facilities for the immense gravity that holds fusion reactions in place in celestial bodies. But when disordered by plasma instability in laboratory experiments the field lines allow the superhot plasma heat to rapidly escape confinement. Such million-degree heat crushes plasma particles together to release fusion energy and can strike and damage fusion facility walls when released from confinement.

https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0085304 (subscription or purchase required)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K