New Developments in Bohmian Mechanics

unica
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
recently,i read some papers about bohmian mechanics.i want someone to introduce me the newest developments in this filed,thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unica said:
recently,i read some papers about bohmian mechanics.i want someone to introduce me the newest developments in this filed,thank you
Unfortunately, an exhaustive review of the newest developments does not exist. For a brief overview of my own new contributions see
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0610138
 
Demystifier said:
Unfortunately, an exhaustive review of the newest developments does not exist. For a brief overview of my own new contributions see
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0610138

Hello, Demystifier, I don't suppose you'd take seriously a quantum hypothesis for a theory of everything that starts by assuming a Bohmian hidden variables theory?

See http://foranewageofreason.blogspirit.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Demystifier said:
Actually, I do. Especially when I recently found out that string theory can be derived from the assumption of Bohmian mechanics:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/0705.3542

Actually I find my own theory of everything hypothesis at least difficult to reconcile with string theory because mine postulates large scale - rather that small scale - extra spatial dimensions where a cause acts nonlocally in addition to the forces, and which are deduced initially from quantum wave and entanglement behaviour.
 
This post is a spin-off of the original post that discussed Barandes theory, A new realistic stochastic interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, for any details about the interpretation in general PLEASE look up for an answer there. Now I want this post to focus on this pre-print: J. A. Barandes, "New Prospects for a Causally Local Formulation of Quantum Theory", arXiv 2402.16935 (2024) My main concerns are that Barandes thinks this deflates the anti-classical Bell's theorem. In Barandes...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
Back
Top