New geometric version of quantum field theory

Click For Summary
The new geometric version of quantum field theory aims to advance the search for a unified theory of quantum gravity, bridging the gap between large-scale and small-scale phenomena in the universe. There is a consensus that the breakdown of locality and unitarity is a plausible conclusion, though the argument lacks convincing intuition. Currently, no formal paper has been published on this topic, but resources such as videos and slides from relevant conferences have been shared for further exploration. Two papers by Arkani-Hamed discussing the positive Grassmannian have been mentioned, though their complexity may challenge understanding. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the potential of this geometric approach in theoretical physics.
Physics news on Phys.org
sas3 said:
The new geometric version of quantum field theory could also facilitate the search for a theory of quantum gravity that would seamlessly connect the large- and small-scale pictures of the universe

https://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20130917-a-jewel-at-the-heart-of-quantum-physics/


I thought some of you may enjoy this.

The intuitive argument that locality and unitarity must break down at some point is not very convincing, even though I find the conclusion plausible.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K