New limit on lorentz invariance violation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the article "A limit on the variation of the speed of light arising from quantum gravity effects," which establishes a new lower limit on linear energy dependence at 1.2EPlanck. The term MQGn, or quantum gravity mass, is identified as a parameter used to scale dispersion. Participants express confusion regarding the implications of the new limit, questioning whether it indicates a higher or lower threshold for testing Lorentz Invariance Violation (LIV) time delays compared to previous measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum gravity concepts
  • Familiarity with Lorentz Invariance Violation (LIV)
  • Knowledge of energy dispersion in physics
  • Basic comprehension of Planck units
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of quantum gravity mass (MQGn) in theoretical physics
  • Study the methodology behind measuring Lorentz Invariance Violation (LIV)
  • Explore the significance of Planck energy in modern physics
  • Investigate previous limits on the speed of light and their experimental contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum gravity, and students studying advanced theoretical physics concepts will benefit from this discussion.

connor415
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Seasons greetings all,

I am trying to dissect a really interesting article:

http://www.nature.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/nature/journal/v462/n7271/full/nature08574.html

but I am struggling with some of the more technical terms in it. I have shown it to some lecturers at my uni and even they are confused.

For example, what is the MQGn?

Its called the quantum gravity mass.

All i could find on it is that it is a parameter used to scale dispersion.

I am also struggling to understand exactly what is the result of the experiment. Its says it places a new lower limit on linear energy dependence at 1.2EPlanck, so does that mean that it was higher or lower before? Can they only test LIV time delays down to 1.2EPlanck?

Arggghhhhh :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh right thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
522
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 199 ·
7
Replies
199
Views
38K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
21K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K