New Words Thread: Enrich English & Generate Traffic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thread
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This thread explores the creation of new words to enrich the English language and discusses the implications of these words on search engine visibility and traffic generation for the forum. The discussion includes playful linguistic creativity, definitions of proposed words, and reflections on language use.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose new words, such as "Decaninetion" and "stopptoofrumfloppen," and discuss their meanings and origins.
  • There is a question about whether the words need to be newly created or simply new to most people.
  • Participants express differing views on the necessity of searching for existing definitions before creating new words.
  • Several humorous definitions are suggested, including "Busterholder" and "Pandaphobia," with playful commentary on their meanings.
  • Concerns are raised about the impact of obscure words on the forum's visibility in search engines, with discussions on Google algorithms and site rankings.
  • Some participants reflect on the nature of language and rules, proposing terms like "Procusteopathic" and "Procrusteopathic Proctitis" as new medical terms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the playful intent of creating new words, but there are multiple competing views regarding the criteria for these words and their implications for search engine visibility. The discussion remains unresolved on several points, particularly regarding the logic of search engine rankings.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion over the relationship between unique content and search engine rankings, indicating a lack of clarity on how Google evaluates and ranks sites based on originality and readability.

  • #31
Andre said:
It appears that google panda continuously crawls around the sites

Google bots crawl the web since Google started as a search engine. Panda is a codename for a new algorithm (or perhaps an upgrade to the old algorithm) used to analyze data collected by bots. Stating "google panda crawls the web" doesn't make much sense.

Panda was one of zillions algo updates done by Google in the last few years (see for example http://www.sistrix.co.uk/google-updates/). The "new, fresh, original content" mantra is repeated by Google since at least 2005 (that's when I read it for the first time). Plenty of examples that it is only part of the reality, and following the idea is not a guarantee of anything. At the same time PF as a forum is a source of a lot of new content every day, one thread is not going to change anything.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
I knew we got slammed by Panda Update #23 and have not recovered since.
 
  • #33
Andre said:
It appears that google panda continuously crawls around the sites to monitor contents and analyse it on orginality, readability and news value. It downgrades sites that contains mostly copied material, a lot of ads or incomprehenseable non appealing jargon. It favors sites with original contents and things that appeal to the general public.
Where is the difference between original contents (here: words not appearing anywhere else) and incomprehenseable jargon?
 
  • #34
mfb said:
Where is the difference between original contents (here: words not appearing anywhere else) and incomprehenseable jargon?

No orginal contents means sentences not found anywhere else, be it directly copied or reworked. This sentence is an original content New words appear interesting but it was only a supposition, appealing to the public except Turbo :wink: . Here is an idea what Panda looks for: More guidance on building high quality sites

Incomprehensible jargon is obviously still about existing words that are not appealing for the general public. Or maybe it does:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #35
lyool : A person who is either a liar or a fool.
 
  • #36
Johnny Carson, in his role as Karnak, came up with one that I love. I only heard it, as opposed to seeing it in print, and that was probably 30-35 years ago, so I have no idea whether or not I'm spelling it correctly: Glotchophobia—the fear of, while naked, running full speed backwards into a doorknob.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 142 ·
5
Replies
142
Views
6K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 212 ·
8
Replies
212
Views
16K