News on an NP problem from an Amoeba

  • Thread starter Thread starter fresh_42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    News
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the NP=P problem and its implications, particularly in relation to biological organisms like amoebas and their ability to solve complex computational problems such as the traveling salesman problem (TSP). Participants explore the intersection of computational theory and biological processes, considering both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares a study indicating that the plasmodium of Physarum polycephalum can find solutions to the TSP in linear time as the problem size increases, suggesting potential for novel analogue computing methods.
  • Another participant reflects on the philosophical implications of the NP=P question, questioning whether intrinsic difficulties exist in solving NP problems or if it is a matter of human capability.
  • Some participants discuss the role of simulation methods in solving NP problems, contrasting computational approaches with natural processes.
  • There is mention of previous studies involving bees and ants solving TSP through scent trails, raising questions about the nature of problem-solving in biological systems.
  • A participant speculates on the relationship between NP problems and oracle machines, suggesting that the scent trails could be analogous to an oracle tape in computation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the NP=P problem and its implications, with no consensus reached. Some agree on the validity of biological problem-solving methods, while others emphasize the challenges of computational approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various studies and concepts without resolving the complexities involved in the NP=P question or the implications of biological computation. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of computational efficiency and biological intelligence.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying computational theory, biology, optimization problems, and the philosophical implications of problem-solving in nature.

fresh_42
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
2025 Award
Messages
20,819
Reaction score
28,461
No, joke, I really dreamt somebody has solved the NP=P problem these days. Well, as I didn't dream of the proof, it probably won't matter that I don't remember the outcome. But I never had expected help from this side:

Abstract
Choosing a better move correctly and quickly is a fundamental skill of living organisms that corresponds to solving a computationally demanding problem. A unicellular plasmodium of Physarum polycephalum searches for a solution to the traveling salesman problem (TSP) by changing its shape to minimize the risk of being exposed to aversive light stimuli. In our previous studies, we reported the results on the eight-city TSP solution. In this study, we show that the time taken by plasmodium to find a reasonably high-quality TSP solution grows linearly as the problem size increases from four to eight. Interestingly, the quality of the solution does not degrade despite the explosive expansion of the search space. Formulating a computational model, we show that the linear-time solution can be achieved if the intrinsic dynamics could allocate intracellular resources to grow the plasmodium terminals with a constant rate, even while responding to the stimuli. These results may lead to the development of novel analogue computers enabling approximate solutions of complex optimization problems in linear time.
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.180396
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest, anorlunda, jedishrfu and 1 other person
Technology news on Phys.org
Ameoba to be or not ameoba to be
that is the question for NP=?=P
 
My, how unexpected. Your dream antenna seems right on.
 
The question really bothers me. I knew someone who lost a bet on it (solved until somewhat in the 90s) and had to pay for a balloon trip across the Alps. But what makes it so exciting is the question beyond: Are there intrinsic difficulties out there or are we just not smart enough? That some Amoebas beats us to it is a bit embarrassing.
 
I think its more a problem of solving it via simulation methods. The difference between computationally finding a geodesic vs actually letting gravity do its thing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aaroman, QuantumQuest and fresh_42
jedishrfu said:
The difference between computationally finding a geodesic vs actually letting gravity do its thing.
Good comparison.
 
However I think your view is valid too in that we haven't yet found a means to compute it quickly yet since we know its done in nature.
 
Weren't there earlier reports of the traveling salesmen solved by bees or ants? I recall that they left scent trails, shortest paths had the strongest scent, and later ants followed the strongest scent.
 
anorlunda said:
Weren't there earlier reports of the traveling salesmen solved by bees or ants? I recall that they left scent trails, shortest paths had the strongest scent, and later ants followed the strongest scent.
I think I've read something similar. On the other hand, IIRC (it's really long ago) then NP problems are solvable in P if there is an oracle tape attached to the TM. The scents can probably be interpreted as such a tape.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K