B Newton's Rings central spot brightness

AI Thread Summary
When light is illuminated from below a plano-convex lens, the central spot appears bright due to constructive interference, while illumination from above results in a dark central spot due to a phase change from reflection. The difference in brightness is attributed to the refractive index of the materials involved, where light refracted through glass experiences a pi phase shift. The presence of reflection at the interface between two identical materials, like glass, affects the intensity of transmission, with no reflection leading to higher transmission intensity. The discussion highlights the interplay of light behavior and material properties in optical phenomena. Understanding these principles is essential for applications in optics and lens design.
versine
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
How come when the illumination is from below, the central spot is bright, but when the illumination is from above, the central spot is dark?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know what causes the rings?
 
I think when shining light from underneath, whether a central bright fringe is obtained or not also depends on the thickness/height of the plano-convex lens.

For the light above case, at the centre, the 2 rays travel the same distance, only that one is reflected off a medium (air) of lower refractive index, so no phase change. The other is refracted off a medium of higher refractive index (glass), so there is a pi phase change, leading to a central dark spot
 
Ibix said:
Do you know what causes the rings?
Hi sir, could you please explain why shining light from underneath produces a bright spot at the centre?
 
phantomvommand said:
Hi sir, could you please explain why shining light from underneath produces a bright spot at the centre?
Let's say you are on the other side of the glass from the light. The center of the curved and straight glasses touch. Will you get any reflection at the interface (hint: is it really an interface if two identical materials are in direct contact)?

If you get reflection, what effect does this have on the intensity of transmission? If you get no reflection, what effect does this have on the intensity of transmission?
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur, vanhees71 and phantomvommand
Ibix said:
Let's say you are on the other side of the glass from the light. The center of the curved and straight glasses touch. Will you get any reflection at the interface (hint: is it really an interface if two identical materials are in direct contact)?
This is an example of why I love PF so much. Just a few words and no equations to give pretty much the whole story!
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top