News No fault divorce, the biggest idiocy of all times ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fault
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of no-fault divorce laws, which many believe discourage marriage by allowing one spouse to claim half of the other's earnings without fault. Participants argue that these laws unfairly require financial support for ex-spouses, particularly in short marriages without children, and suggest that couples should walk away with their pre-marriage assets intact. Some view marriage as a civil contract rather than a religious sacrament, advocating for a reevaluation of laws that support ex-spouses. The conversation also touches on the historical context of marriage and the evolving nature of its legal definitions. Overall, there is a consensus that current divorce laws may be detrimental to the institution of marriage.
  • #181
DanP said:
Ok, then what's the effect ?

Now you asked the right question. I might add my own, which is, "quantify and qualify the effect, BOTH."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
13K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K