- #181
Frame Dragger
- 1,507
- 1
DanP said:
Now you asked the right question. I might add my own, which is, "quantify and qualify the effect, BOTH."
No fault divorce, the biggest idiocy of all times ?
- Context: News
- Thread starter DanP
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Fault
Click For Summary
SUMMARY
The discussion centers on the implications of no-fault divorce laws and their impact on marriage, particularly in the context of high-profile cases like Sandra Bullock and Jesse James. Participants argue that such laws discourage marriage by allowing ex-spouses to claim financial support regardless of fault. The conversation highlights the necessity of prenuptial agreements to protect individual assets and questions the fairness of alimony payments. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that current laws may undermine the institution of marriage rather than support it.
PREREQUISITES- Understanding of no-fault divorce laws
- Knowledge of prenuptial agreements and their legal implications
- Familiarity with alimony and spousal support regulations
- Awareness of the historical context of marriage as a civil contract
- Research the specifics of no-fault divorce laws in various states
- Learn about the legal framework and enforceability of prenuptial agreements
- Examine the criteria for alimony determination in divorce cases
- Explore the historical evolution of marriage laws and their societal implications
Individuals considering marriage, family law practitioners, financial advisors, and anyone interested in the legal aspects of divorce and marriage contracts.