Non changing variables in wave function.

Penguinluons
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi. I would like to know which variables in the wave function are constant (in this local context) and which are not. The wave number for instance varies in the article I was reading (WKB approximation). Why is this so? What other variable in the wavefunction can vary?

Please help me as I am young and new to this...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are no "variables" in the wave function. You have a complex amplitude that is position dependent, and that's it.

The WKB approximation is a semi-classical method, which attributes a classical wave number which varies with position, depending on the potential. But it is not an intrinsic value of the actual quantum wave function.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
DrClaude said:
There are no "variables" in the wave function. You have a complex amplitude that is position dependent, and that's it.

The WKB approximation is a semi-classical method, which attributes a classical wave number which varies with position, depending on the potential. But it is not an intrinsic value of the actual quantum wave function.

Thanks for your reply... Maybe I phrased my sentence incorrectly. By variables I was referring to κ (Wave Number) and ω. Do these change as the wavefunction evolves?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top