Non-Constant Angular Acceleration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the time required for a mass with a known moment of inertia to rotate 90 degrees under a non-constant angular acceleration due to a spring force. The user explores various methods, including using torque and angular acceleration equations, and considers numerical approaches when analytical solutions are not feasible. The Stormer Verlet algorithm is recommended for scenarios where analytical solutions are impractical, emphasizing the need for fixed time steps in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular dynamics and moment of inertia
  • Familiarity with torque and angular acceleration equations
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly in relation to rotational motion
  • Experience with numerical methods for solving differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Stormer Verlet algorithm for numerical integration in physics simulations
  • Learn about Lagrangian mechanics for complex force systems
  • Study the application of fixed time step methods in dynamic simulations
  • Explore advanced topics in rotational dynamics, including non-linear systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in simulations of rotational motion or dynamic systems requiring non-constant acceleration analysis.

DCELL
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Solving for time to rotate 90 degrees with varying angular acceleration
Hello, I am trying to solve a problem involving a mass with known moment of inertia about an axis with a lever arm at angle theta and length r with a non-constant spring force acting at the tip of the lever arm and fixed distance away from the axis of rotation.

I am wondering what the best way to solve for the time to rotate 90 degrees is without assuming the angular acceleration due to torque is constant.

I thought about solving for the acceleration in .1deg intervals using the equation T = alpha * I, and then using that acceleration to calculate the angular velocity at that degree interval using the previous velocity as the "initial" and so on and so forth and finally taking the change in angular velocities between intervals to solve for the time between and then summing the interval times for a total time. I'm not sure if this is the correct approach.

Any help would be appreciated!

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • REF.jpg
    REF.jpg
    21.9 KB · Views: 194
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with calculus?
 
It's been a semester or two but yes.
 
So then we have ##\vec r \times \vec F= I \ddot \theta##. Indeed, depending on the form of ##\vec F## there may not be an analytical solution so you may have to compute it numerically

You also may find a Lagrangian approach to be helpful if ##\vec F## is difficult to figure out.
 
So I am able to calculate what ##\tau## is and subsequently ##\alpha## for each "iteration" that I have. The point of confusion comes in when I am trying to solve for the Total time of the event. Currently what I've tried is using the equation ##\omega_f^2 = \omega_i^2 + 2\alpha\theta## and treating ##\omega_f## as the current iteration velocity and ##\omega_i## as the initial/previous except for the first iteration where it is equal to zero.

Then using ##\omega = \omega_i + \alpha t## I solve for the time in between the steps where the total time between steps is the time of the event where ##\alpha## was the previous iterations acceleration due to that force/torque.

I've also thought about using ##\theta = \omega_i t + \frac 1 2 \alpha t^2## and solving for t using the quadratic equation which yields similar results as the above

I'm just not confident in the validity of the results and if using the equations for constant acceleration in specific reference frames (every .1deg) is a valid method.
 
If the equation cannot be solved analytically then you will be better served to use something like the basic Stormer Verlet algorithm described here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verlet_integration

This uses a fixed step in time rather than a fixed step in space.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DCELL
Dale said:
If the equation cannot be solved analytically then you will be better served to use something like the basic Stormer Verlet algorithm described here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verlet_integration

This uses a fixed step in time rather than a fixed step in space.
Thank you for the information - Ill give this a shot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
744
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K