cuak2000
- 7
- 0
Hey, everyone. I'm trying to prove the following:
[tex]f_n[/tex] and [tex]f_n[/tex] are real-valued function in [tex]\Omega[/tex]
[tex]\{\omega: f_n(\omega) \nrightarrow f(\omega) \} = \\<br /> \bigcup^{\infty}_{k=1} \bigcap^{\infty}_{N=1} \bigcup^{\infty}_{n=1} <br /> \{ \omega : | f_n(\omega) - f(\omega) | \geq 1/k \}<br /> <br /> [/tex]
I am convinced by the proof I've made up, but it isn't formal, so I would appreciate if you could help me give it more formality.
Let's call the left side of the equality L and the right side R.
L can be written:
[tex]\exists k \in \mathbb{N} \quad \forall N \quad \exists n \geq N \quad | f_n(\omega) \nrightarrow f(\omega) | \geq 1/k[/tex]
On the other hand, the last part of R is
[tex]\bigcap^{\infty}_{N=1} \bigcup^{\infty}_{n=1} <br /> \{ \omega : | f_n(\omega) - f(\omega) | \geq 1/k \}[/tex]
which basically takes all the [tex]\omega[/tex] that [tex]\forall N[/tex] have
at least one [tex]n \geq N[/tex] that makes the absolute difference bigger than 1/k
If you take the union for all k, then you have the definition for being in L.
Thanks in advance,
cd
[tex]f_n[/tex] and [tex]f_n[/tex] are real-valued function in [tex]\Omega[/tex]
[tex]\{\omega: f_n(\omega) \nrightarrow f(\omega) \} = \\<br /> \bigcup^{\infty}_{k=1} \bigcap^{\infty}_{N=1} \bigcup^{\infty}_{n=1} <br /> \{ \omega : | f_n(\omega) - f(\omega) | \geq 1/k \}<br /> <br /> [/tex]
I am convinced by the proof I've made up, but it isn't formal, so I would appreciate if you could help me give it more formality.
Let's call the left side of the equality L and the right side R.
L can be written:
[tex]\exists k \in \mathbb{N} \quad \forall N \quad \exists n \geq N \quad | f_n(\omega) \nrightarrow f(\omega) | \geq 1/k[/tex]
On the other hand, the last part of R is
[tex]\bigcap^{\infty}_{N=1} \bigcup^{\infty}_{n=1} <br /> \{ \omega : | f_n(\omega) - f(\omega) | \geq 1/k \}[/tex]
which basically takes all the [tex]\omega[/tex] that [tex]\forall N[/tex] have
at least one [tex]n \geq N[/tex] that makes the absolute difference bigger than 1/k
If you take the union for all k, then you have the definition for being in L.
Thanks in advance,
cd
Last edited: