Non-degenerate Hermitian Matrices and their Eigenvalues

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of non-degenerate 2x2 matrices, specifically focusing on whether such a matrix can have only real eigenvalues while not being Hermitian. The original poster presents a specific matrix and explores its eigenvalues and characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to demonstrate that a specific 2x2 matrix has real eigenvalues while questioning its Hermitian nature. Some participants question the validity of the eigenvalue equation used and explore simplifications that lead to contradictory results.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the mathematical properties of the matrix and eigenvalue equations. There is a recognition of conflicting interpretations of the eigenvalue calculations, and some participants express a sense of resolution regarding the validity of the original example.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of the matrix being non-degenerate and the conditions under which eigenvalues are real. Participants are also addressing potential errors in the eigenvalue equations referenced in their notes.

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


Is there a non-degenerate 2x2 matrix that has only real eigenvalues but is not Hermitian? (Either find such a matrix, or prove that it doesn't exist)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's my problem. I'm getting Contradicting results.

So, I found this 2x2 matrix:
\begin{matrix}
1 & 2 \\
3 & 2
\end{matrix}

This matrix has eigenvalues of 4 and -1.

This matrix is not hermitian as the hermitian representation of this matrix transposes it.

Therefore this matrix is a 2x2 matrix that is non-degenerate and is NOT hermitian and has ONLY real eigenvalues.

This should be the example that the question was looking for.

However, in my notes, I have the equation for eigenvalues being
eigenvalue = [(a+b)+/- (squareroot ((a-b)^2-4cd))]/2

where
\begin{matrix}
a & c \\
d & b
\end{matrix}

And if we take this representation, we get negative eigenvalues.

What is going on here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RJLiberator said:
However, in my notes, I have the equation for eigenvalues being
eigenvalue = [(a+b)+/- (squareroot ((a-b)^2-4cd))]/2

where
\begin{matrix}
a & c \\
d & b
\end{matrix}

And if we take this representation, we get negative eigenvalues.

What is going on here?
Are you sure about that equation?
I find, by expanding ##\det(A-\lambda I)=0## and solving the quadratic equation:
##\lambda=\frac{(a+b)\pm\sqrt{(a+b)²-4(ab-cd)}}{2}##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Yes, I agree with what you are saying, and I noticed that as well, however, if you simplify it further:

(a+b)^2 = a^2+b^2+2ab
So then, 2ab-4ab becomes -2ab.

so now we have a^2+b^2-2ab-4cd
but a^2+b^2-2ab is just (a-b)^2 and so we get
(a-b)^2-4cd.

which is why I am getting contradictory results.
What is going wrong?
 
RJLiberator said:
Yes, I agree with what you are saying, and I noticed that as well, however, if you simplify it further:

(a+b)^2 = a^2+b^2+2ab
So then, 2ab-4ab becomes -2ab.

so now we have a^2+b^2-2ab-4cd
but a^2+b^2-2ab is just (a-b)^2 and so we get
(a-b)^2-4cd.

which is why I am getting contradictory results.
What is going wrong?
It should be ##+4cd## after the simplification.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Ah...yes, that was the source of my frustration.

So, it seems my example now holds up and has nothing contradicting it.

Thank you kindly.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K