What Is the Correct Non-Dimensional Time Scaling in CFD for 2D Channel Flow?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on non-dimensional time scaling in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for simulating 2D channel flow involving relaxation oscillations between two viscous fluids. The user proposes using the time scale defined as ##\tau = \sqrt{\rho l^3 / \sigma}##, considering the effects of gravity and viscosity negligible. The conversation highlights the importance of proper dimensionless scaling for calculating the Weber number, which is crucial for the accuracy of the simulation. The user seeks further insights on incorporating velocity into the Weber number calculation, particularly in the context of inviscid flow.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of non-dimensionalization in fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with the Navier-Stokes equations
  • Knowledge of the Weber number and its significance in fluid mechanics
  • Experience with CFD software for simulating fluid flows
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and application of the Weber number in fluid dynamics
  • Explore the implications of inviscid flow assumptions in CFD simulations
  • Learn about non-dimensional analysis techniques in CFD
  • Investigate the role of surface tension in fluid interface dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, engineers, and students involved in fluid dynamics, particularly those working with CFD simulations of multi-phase flows and seeking to optimize their modeling techniques.

member 428835
Hi PF!

I'm running a CFD software that non-dimensionalizes the NS equations. The problem I'm simulating is a 2D channel flow: relaxation oscillations of an interface between two viscous fluids, shown here. I'm trying to see what they are non-dimensionalizing time with, which is evidently just ##\tau## shown here.

Thinking about my problem, quantities that involve time are ##g,\mu,\sigma##. However, I'm setting ##g=0## and trying assume inviscid flow so ##\mu \ll 1##. This makes me think for my problem ##\tau = \sqrt{\rho l^3 / \sigma}##. Do you agree?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The proper dimensionless scaling depends on application. I can't honestly tell you what your software package uses, but the scaling you provide does look like a good building block for producing the Weber number in your final dimensionless equation, which would be appropriate here.
 
boneh3ad said:
The proper dimensionless scaling depends on application. I can't honestly tell you what your software package uses, but the scaling you provide does look like a good building block for producing the Weber number in your final dimensionless equation, which would be appropriate here.
Not sure why I missed this until now? The issue with the Weber number is the velocity, which I compute with the surface tension (it's the only temporal component since we look at an inviscid fluid). Any other ideas?

Apologies for the late reply.
 

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K