Non equilibrium boson distribution function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the non-equilibrium boson distribution function, which generalizes the standard form to ##f = \frac{1}{e^{\frac{E}{T(1+ \Theta)}} - 1}##, incorporating a function ##\Theta##. This form is considered valid as an approximation for small deviations from local equilibrium, allowing the application of Onsager's relations. The derivation connects to classical Bose-Einstein statistics and entropy density perturbations, emphasizing the relationship between energy density and temperature under non-equilibrium conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with Bose-Einstein statistics
  • Knowledge of Onsager's reciprocal relations
  • Basic concepts of non-equilibrium thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Bose-Einstein distribution function
  • Explore Onsager's relations in detail
  • Research non-equilibrium thermodynamics principles
  • Examine perturbation theory in statistical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in statistical mechanics, and students studying non-equilibrium thermodynamics will benefit from this discussion.

center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
In statistical mechanics the boson distribution function has the well known form
##f = \frac{1}{e^{E/T} - 1},##
(in the special case of zero chemical potential). As one considers the non-equilibrium variant this generalize to
##f = \frac{1}{e^{\frac{E}{T(1+ \Theta)}} - 1},##
for some function ##\Theta##. Now, is there any intuitive (or rigorous) explanation of why this is the correct form for the non-equilibrium distribution?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Given that I haven't studied NE thermodynamics, this is my attempt:

If the expression is correct (and I haven't found a reference), it is likely correct as an approximation for small deviations from a local equilibrium. Then we can apply Onsager's relations. Onsager looked at the the entropy density s, so

du = T ds

when neglecting chemical potential. [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onsager_reciprocal_relations ]

The classical derivation of the Bose-Einstein partition statistics uses S = k lnW to identify β = 1/kT from dE = T dS (again neglecting C.P.). [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell–Boltzmann_statistics#Derivation_from_canonical_ensemble ] You have normalized k =1.

Small perturbations in entropy density would show up as perturbations in the energy density du = T (1 + Θ) ds under the approximation.* We get E/T(1+Θ) where it was previously E/T.

* The convenient functional form, since T = constant is a possible constraint.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
476
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
1K