Non-linear conductivity of tap water

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the non-linear conductivity of tap water as observed through experimental measurements involving stainless steel nails immersed in the water. Participants explore the implications of their findings, the potential for experimental errors, and the underlying physical principles that may explain the observed behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that conductivity between nails in tap water decreases at low voltages, suggesting a deviation from expected linear behavior.
  • Another participant proposes that a "contact potential" phenomenon might explain the low current at lower voltages, along with a possible phase term related to charge travel time.
  • A participant asserts that water is not a linear ohmic medium, indicating a fundamental property of water's conductivity.
  • One participant identifies experimental errors related to the AC supply voltage dropping under load and temperature variations, leading to imprecise measurements.
  • Another participant reflects on the observation that tap water seems to follow Ohm's law closely at certain voltage ranges, questioning the conditions under which this holds true.
  • Further discussion raises the challenge of understanding why tap water exhibits linear conductivity under specific conditions but may not do so under others, such as varying temperatures or concentrations.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about calculating depth based on resistance due to potential non-linear behavior and discusses the effects of heating on conductivity.
  • Another participant shares plans to improve experimental precision by using a constant temperature water source and a thermocouple for accurate temperature measurements.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of information available online regarding the non-linearity of electrolytes, despite extensive discussions on temperature-related non-linearity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the nature of water's conductivity. While some acknowledge the potential for experimental error, others maintain that the observed non-linearity may be a genuine characteristic of tap water. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the underlying causes of the observed phenomena.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential experimental errors, dependence on the specific conditions of the measurements (such as voltage and temperature), and the lack of established literature on the non-linearity of electrolytes.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying electrochemistry, experimental physics, or anyone exploring the properties of conductive materials, particularly in relation to water and electrolytes.

Roger44
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
Hi everbody
My plots seem to show that conductivity between two nails immersed a few mm in tap water falls off at low voltages instead of being a horizontal flat line as would be the case for a linear ohmic medium. And the deeper the immersion, the less linear the conductivity. Is this normal or an experimental error?

I measured 50Hz AC current between two stainless steel nails in cold tap water in a small round dish at 5 different voltages, and repeated at five depths (a few mm)

934707pourforum12.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting data. I do think at lower voltages you might see something like a "contact potential" phenomenon where you get nearly zero current unless you exceed a certain voltage. There could also be a voltage amplitude dependent phase term caused by the time it takes for the charges (electrons) to travel from one nail to the other.
 
Water is not a linear ohmic medium.
 
Hi

There was an elementary shame-on-you experimental error. My 50 Hz AC supply was a simple "about" 10V output mains transformer whose voltage fell off when I pulled current. Temperature variation imprecision too. I dug out my signal generator, checked it on the oscillo' and started again. There's experimental imprecision at low values.

90282620160716conducbowlgnpg.jpg
 
Roger44 said:
Hi

There was an elementary shame-on-you experimental error. My 50 Hz AC supply was a simple "about" 10V output mains transformer whose voltage fell off when I pulled current. Temperature variation imprecision too. I dug out my signal generator, checked it on the oscillo' and started again. There's experimental imprecision at low values.

90282620160716conducbowlgnpg.jpg
It's interesting how "water" which would not generally be categorized as something that would necessarily obey Ohm's law seems to follow it fairly closely.
 
Now the real challenge would be to deduce by scientific reasoning why simple tap water is linear at these voltages ranges and wouldn't be at other temperatures/concentrations/voltages, if that is the case, Beyond me, friends!
 
Roger44 said:
There was an elementary shame-on-you experimental error.
So you're now distancing yourself from your earlier results where resistance appeared to vary with depth over just a few mm.?
 
Hi
No, resistance is a very good indicator of shallow water depth variations but I'm not sure you can calculate exactly the depth because the voltage/current may not be linear. I'm still working on this possible non-linearity.

Firstly I'm awaiting a precise AC signal source which should counter the erratic values at low voltages, at the bottom left end of the curve. A second problem is the fact that when current flows it heats water and hot water, unlike copper, conducts more. So there's a sort of thermal runaway until thermal equilibrium.is reached. This would account for the rising slope.
I've measured under flowing constant temp tap water with a thermistor between the electrodes. The thermistor still reports a temp increase, but less than a °C. The slope is still rising to an extent that cannot be accounted for by such a small temp increase.

I'll try to push the experimental precision further by measuring in the stream at the bottom of the garden in order to have an abundant gush of constant temp water, and a constantin thermocouple to have temp changes according to a different technology.

I've also recorded the very first value displayed by the voltmeter when the circuit is closed, before the water begins heating. This also shows a rising slope very similar to the 'almost constant temp' slope. So conductivity may not be linear. I shall improve the rapidity of the measure by a 10 readings per sec digital recording.

All comments and suggestions are more than welcome. What bothers me is that nowhere on the Net can I find any mention of non-linearity of electrolytes. Even manufacturers of conductivity cells for measuring properties of liquids make no mention of it. Lots and lots on temperature non-linearity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
448
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
16K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
94K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K