Non-local effects and information

[mosassam]

Sticking strictly to the quote you have decided to analyse.
Growing and Dying are presented as mutually exclusive states. When introduced to your 'proof' you will find point 4: contravened.
Are you familiar with the phrase 'figure of speech'?
Do you have anything to add to the actual thread?

 

[moving finger]

Sticking strictly to the quote you have decided to analyse.
Growing and Dying are presented as mutually exclusive states. When introduced to your 'proof' you will find point 4: contravened.

Nope - point 4 simply says that all non-dying objects are growing objects (which is completely consistent with dying and growing being mutually exclusive).

I agree this is off topic, so I'm happy to stop here

 

[D_Arsonval]

The original post on this was during February?
Oh Well.

I would suspect it’s important to plead ignorance before uttering
a single “key-stroke”.

Especially when replying to something like Non-Local Effects/affects.
(Of which the topic seems to have dried-up based on the last post(s) dated nearly a long “time” ago.)

Never the less. Here’s some more “hash” to add to this thread.

“Time”, and the moment of time when an observation is made seems to trump a lot of stuff.

For as time elapses, so do all of the other measured/observed treasures.

To acknowledge, and accept such a stark fact can at times be humiliating.

Of course it’s changed! It’s right now, and not just a moment ago!

In the meantime?

John