I Non-relativistic limit of Klein Gordon field

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the non-relativistic limit of the Klein-Gordon (KG) field and its implications for quantum field theory. It highlights the complexity of the KG field due to the non-commutativity of field operators, questioning the Wikipedia claim that creation and annihilation operators decouple in this limit. Participants clarify that the KG field can be decomposed into positive and negative energy components, leading to a new field that resembles the Schrödinger field, which does not exhibit the same decomposition. The conversation emphasizes that the transition to the non-relativistic limit should preserve particle number conservation. Overall, the participants express confusion over the Wikipedia explanation and seek further clarification on the derivation of the KG field in this context.
dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
TL;DR
Non-relativistic limit of Klein Gordon field (not the equation).
From Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klein%E2%80%93Gordon_equation said:
The analogous limit of a quantum Klein-Gordon field is complicated by the non-commutativity of the field operator. In the limit v ≪ c, the creation and annihilation operators decouple and behave as independent quantum Schrödinger fields.

Which should be conceptually similar of what happen in the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equations when you see that the solutions decouple.

Do you have any reference that I can look up where the derivation for the KG field is performed?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That quote from wikipedia doesn't make sense to me. How can the creation and annihilation operators "decouple"? They're hermitian conjugates of each other, not two independent variables linked by dynamics. From what I've seen taking the non-relativisitic limit for the KG field simply involves taking the ##\mathbf{k} \rightarrow 0## limit.

In any case I don't you think you can truly recover the Schrodinger field from the KG field since the latter is quantized as a physical observable right from the beginning while the former is not observable.
 
HomogenousCow said:
That quote from wikipedia doesn't make sense to me. How can the creation and annihilation operators "decouple"?
The KG filed ##\phi## can be decomposed in positive and negative energies field ##\phi^+## and ##\phi^-##, and in the KG Lagrangian there are mixed term like ##\bar \phi \phi = \phi^+\phi^+ + \phi^+\phi^- + ...## I think they mean that, in the non relativistic limit, your KG filed will "become" a new field ##\psi## which can not be decomposed in positive/negative energies fields, and so the ##\bar \phi \phi## term will become simply ##\bar \psi \psi##. Now ##\bar \psi \neq \psi##, as opposed to the KG field that satisfies ##\bar \phi = \phi##. In this limit we should also recover particle number conservation. This new field ##\psi## should be what they call the Schrodinger field.

This is how I understood after researching a little bit on the internet, but maybe it's wrong. I don't know QFT... I was just curious about this
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...