Non-relativistic limit of Klein Gordon field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The non-relativistic limit of the Klein-Gordon (KG) field involves the decoupling of creation and annihilation operators, leading to a new field representation that resembles the Schrödinger field. In this limit, the KG field can be decomposed into positive and negative energy components, which transforms into a single field, denoted as ψ, that does not exhibit this decomposition. This transition also ensures the conservation of particle number, distinguishing the behavior of the KG field from the Schrödinger field. The discussion highlights the complexities of the KG field's quantization and its implications in quantum field theory (QFT).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with the Klein-Gordon equation
  • Knowledge of creation and annihilation operators
  • Concept of non-relativistic limits in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the non-relativistic limit of the Klein-Gordon field
  • Study the relationship between the Klein-Gordon field and the Schrödinger field
  • Explore the implications of particle number conservation in quantum field theory
  • Examine the role of Hermitian conjugates in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, graduate students studying advanced quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the foundations of particle physics.

dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
TL;DR
Non-relativistic limit of Klein Gordon field (not the equation).
From Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klein%E2%80%93Gordon_equation said:
The analogous limit of a quantum Klein-Gordon field is complicated by the non-commutativity of the field operator. In the limit v ≪ c, the creation and annihilation operators decouple and behave as independent quantum Schrödinger fields.

Which should be conceptually similar of what happen in the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equations when you see that the solutions decouple.

Do you have any reference that I can look up where the derivation for the KG field is performed?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That quote from wikipedia doesn't make sense to me. How can the creation and annihilation operators "decouple"? They're hermitian conjugates of each other, not two independent variables linked by dynamics. From what I've seen taking the non-relativisitic limit for the KG field simply involves taking the ##\mathbf{k} \rightarrow 0## limit.

In any case I don't you think you can truly recover the Schrödinger field from the KG field since the latter is quantized as a physical observable right from the beginning while the former is not observable.
 
HomogenousCow said:
That quote from wikipedia doesn't make sense to me. How can the creation and annihilation operators "decouple"?
The KG filed ##\phi## can be decomposed in positive and negative energies field ##\phi^+## and ##\phi^-##, and in the KG Lagrangian there are mixed term like ##\bar \phi \phi = \phi^+\phi^+ + \phi^+\phi^- + ...## I think they mean that, in the non relativistic limit, your KG filed will "become" a new field ##\psi## which can not be decomposed in positive/negative energies fields, and so the ##\bar \phi \phi## term will become simply ##\bar \psi \psi##. Now ##\bar \psi \neq \psi##, as opposed to the KG field that satisfies ##\bar \phi = \phi##. In this limit we should also recover particle number conservation. This new field ##\psi## should be what they call the Schrödinger field.

This is how I understood after researching a little bit on the internet, but maybe it's wrong. I don't know QFT... I was just curious about this
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
628
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K