George Jones
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 7,643
- 1,602
TrickyDicky said:The WP page geodesic entry after explaining the different null, timelike and spacelike types says: "Note that a geodesic cannot be spacelike at one point and timelike at another". Is there a difference in this respect between vectors and geodesics?
Yes, even though vectors and curves are related, there is, in principle, a difference in this respect. In particular, the integral curves associated with the Killing vector field [itex]\partial_t[/itex] (curves of contant r, theta,a and phi) are not geodesics, so your result could possible fail for them. It, however, does not fail, i.e., an individual integral curve for [itex]\partial_t[/itex] does not change its causal character, but different integral curves for [itex]\partial_t[/itex] can different characters. Outside the event horizon (where spactime is static), the integral curves of [itex]\partial_t[/itex] are all timelike; inside the event horizon (where spacetime is not even stationary), the integral curves of [itex]\partial_t[/itex] are all spacelike.
The integral curves for [itex]\partial_t[/itex] are the curved dashed lines on
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...MkRTtjWJfTLsQKpl6i-Cg&ved=0CDcQ9QEwBQ&dur=235
These means that the vectors that make up the vector field [itex]\partial_t[/itex] are tangent vectors for these curves. Note the different causal character outside and inside the event horizon.