I now know that inverses are only defined for square matrices. My question is: is this because inverses for non-square matrices do not exist, i.e. there is no (m by n) matrix A for which there exists an (n by m) matrix B such that both AB = I and BA = I is true?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Or is it just done for convenience? In this cases, can we indeed find a (m by n) matrix A for which there exists an (n by m) matrix B such that both AB = I and BA = I is true?

Thanks!

BiP

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Non-square matrices and inverses

Loading...

Similar Threads - square matrices inverses | Date |
---|---|

Fair to say there are twice as many square matrices as rectangular? | Apr 10, 2013 |

Transforming between square matrices of different order | Aug 28, 2012 |

Solbing equation A(u)=B(v) for square matrices A and B | Apr 1, 2012 |

Linear dependence of square matrices | Feb 10, 2011 |

Linear least square method for singular matrices | Nov 11, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**