Non-Unique Factorization in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-10}]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oxymoron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorization
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that the ring \mathcal{O}_{-10} = \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-10}] is not a unique factorization domain (UFD). The user references their previous work with \mathcal{O}_{-5} = \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}], where they demonstrated non-unique factorization using the integer 21. They propose using the integer 26 to illustrate two distinct factorizations into irreducibles, specifically 26 = 2·13 and 26 = (4 + \sqrt{-10})(4 - \sqrt{-10}), to further support their conclusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of unique factorization domains (UFDs)
  • Familiarity with algebraic integers in quadratic fields
  • Proficiency in using Maple software for mathematical computations
  • Knowledge of irreducible elements in number theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of unique factorization domains in algebraic number theory
  • Learn how to use Maple's "factorEQ" command effectively for number theory problems
  • Investigate the implications of non-unique factorization in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-d}] for various values of d
  • Study examples of irreducible elements in different quadratic fields
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students studying algebraic number theory, particularly those interested in the properties of unique factorization domains and quadratic fields.

Oxymoron
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
I need to determine whether or not \mathcal{O}_{-10} = \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-10}] is a unique factorization domain.

Now, I think the short answer is simply: NO.

The question is meant to be simple (I think).

I just finished proving that \mathcal{O}_{-5} = \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}] is NOT a unique factorization domain and it took me two pages. It involved me finding an integer which had two DIFFERENT factorizations into irreducibles. Using maple and the "factorEQ" command with (numtheory) I found that

21 = 3\cdot 7 = (1+2\sqrt{-5})(1-2\sqrt{-5})[/itex]<br /> <br /> But now for the question at hand, Maple cannot find an integer which equals two factorizations of this sort because, unlike 5, 10 is not a prime.<br /> <br /> Ill let you guys muse over this for a while.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose I could just use

26 = 2\cdot 13 = (4+\sqrt{-10})(4-\sqrt{-10})

and show that no element of \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-10}] of norm 2 or 13 hence 2 and 13 are irreducible. And then show there is no element of norm 4+\sqrt{-10} or 4-\sqrt{-10} and thus, they are irreducible. If I can show that then I have shown that 26can be written as two DIFFERENT factorizaruib into irreducibles which implies the ring is a UFD. This shouldn't be too hard if its the right thing to do. Is it the right thing to do?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K