Non-zero eigenvalues and square matrix

Click For Summary
A singular square matrix with 7 rows can have a maximum of 6 non-zero eigenvalues due to the presence of at least one zero eigenvalue, which results in a determinant of zero. Conversely, a non-singular square matrix with 5 rows can have all 5 eigenvalues non-zero, as the presence of any zero eigenvalue would classify it as singular. The discussion confirms that the explanations provided are correct, emphasizing that these concepts are fundamental in matrix theory and linear algebra. The participant is studying multivariate analysis in statistics, where these topics are relevant. Overall, the conversation reinforces the understanding of eigenvalues in relation to matrix singularity.
Philip Wong
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
hello,

two quick question here. I've got the answer correct (I think), but I am not too sure how to explain it in words. So I hope someone tell me is my attempted explanation correct.

1) what is the maximum of non-zero eigenvalues a singular square matrix with 7 rows can have?

up to and include 6, because we wee at least 1 eigenvalues that is 0, such that it will give the determinate of the matrix will be 0. Therefore the matrix can be a singular square matrix.


2)how many non-zero eigenvalues does a non-singular square matrix with 5 rows have?
5, because if any eigenvalues in a square matrix is 0, it will turn the matrix into a singular square matrix.


by the way, I need some conformity on the idea, singular square matrix is bringing higher dimension matrix into lower dimension, such that it will not have any inverse right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Philip Wong said:
1) what is the maximum number of non-zero eigenvalues a singular square matrix with 7 rows can have?

I think you have missed the word in red :) Ya, both 1 and 2 are correct. However what you ask in the last part, I don't understand it..
 
NaturePaper said:
I think you have missed the word in red :) Ya, both 1 and 2 are correct. However what you ask in the last part, I don't understand it..

thanks! so you mean correct, as in my exaplnation was correct right? not just the answer?

don't worry about the last part of my question.
 
Yes, your explanation is correct too.

By the way, these are very much elementary results and there is no confusion that these can be found in all textbooks of matrix theory/linear algebra :)
 
well I'm doing multivariate analysis in statistics, this is part of the topics covered. so i hope i got it corrected
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
565
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K