Nonuniform density of a planet

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WraithM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Planet
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving the differential equation for an object falling through a planet with nonuniform density defined by the equation ρ = a - r. Participants explore the implications of this density on the gravitational force and the resulting motion equations. The equation of motion is derived as d²r/dt² = (4/3)πaG(r² - r), but it is noted that not all integrals resulting from this equation are solvable in closed form. The conversation highlights the necessity of integrating the mass contained within a sphere of radius r to accurately determine the gravitational force acting on the object.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations and their solutions
  • Familiarity with gravitational force calculations and Newton's laws
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, particularly for nonconstant functions
  • Basic concepts of physics related to mass distribution and density
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integration of nonconstant density functions in gravitational contexts
  • Learn about numerical methods for solving complex integrals
  • Explore the use of software tools like Mathematica or Maple for solving differential equations
  • Investigate elliptical functions and their applications in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mathematicians dealing with differential equations, and anyone interested in gravitational dynamics and nonuniform mass distributions.

WraithM
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I was thinking about a situation like this: You have a planet that has a nonuniform density (mass) like this \rho = a - r where a is just some number and r is the radius away from the center of the planet. Then you have an object falling through the planet. I had no idea how to solve this differential equation. I don't even know if there is a solution. You'd have an F=ma like this: -\frac{G(a - r)(\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3)m}{r^2} = ma. That becomes through simplification: \frac{d^2 r}{dt^2}=\frac{4}{3}\pi a G(r^2 - r). I don't really know much beyond solving simple differential equations. Is this solvable? If there is a solution, how do you get it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WraithM said:
\frac{d^2 r}{dt^2}=\frac{4}{3}\pi a G(r^2 - r). I don't really know much beyond solving simple differential equations. Is this solvable? If there is a solution, how do you get it?

Hi WraithM! :smile:

Use the standard trick of writing dr/dt = v, and then

d2r/dt2

= dv/dt

= dv/dr dr/dt [chain rule]

= v dv/dr :wink:
 
Does that actually work? Do you just separate variables from there? I see the logic of making \frac{d^2 r}{dt^2} = v \frac{dv}{dr}, but I don't want to believe that it's that easy.

For example, take \frac{d^2 r}{dt^2} = g (constant acceleration). Separating variables using v dv/dr: v dv = g dr, that's: v^2/2 = gr
\frac{dr}{dt} = \sqrt{2gr}
\frac{dr}{\sqrt{2gr}} = dt
1/g \sqrt{2gr}=t
r = \frac{gt^2}{2}
Wow, so that actually works?

:/ I'm feeling stupid for not knowing this.

EDIT: I just did this method with my first example, and I get an integral that isn't doable... :/ Am I just stuck then?
 
Last edited:
WraithM said:
Wow, so that actually works?

:biggrin: Woohoo! :biggrin:

(btw, that's how 1/2 mv2 gets into energy equations :wink:)
EDIT: I just did this method with my first example, and I get an integral that isn't doable... :/ Am I just stuck then?

hmm … let's see …

you didn't get vdv = 4/3 πaG (r2 - ar) dr ? :confused:
 
Well, yes. I did get: v \, dv = \frac{4}{3}Ga(r^2 - r)dr
You integrate from (r_{0} to r) that to get v = \sqrt{\frac{8}{3}Ga(r^3/3 - r^2/2 - r_{0}^3/3 + r_{0}^2/2)}. That's all good, but then if you try to go another step further, it blows up. Now I'm solving for r(t). You get: \int_{r_{0}}^{r(t)}\frac{dr}{\sqrt{\frac{8}{3}Ga(r^3/3 - r^2/2 - r_{0}^3/3 + r_{0}^2/2)}} = \int_{0}^{t} dt I don't know how to do that integral. I don't think it's doable. Do you know how to do it? Am I perhaps doing it wrong?
 
WraithM said:
… You get: \int_{r_{0}}^{r(t)}\frac{dr}{\sqrt{\frac{8}{3}Ga(r^3/3 - r^2/2 - r_{0}^3/3 + r_{0}^2/2)}} = \int_{0}^{t} dt I don't know how to do that integral. I don't think it's doable. Do you know how to do it? Am I perhaps doing it wrong?

ah, I didn't realize you wanted to go as far as solving for r as a function of t :redface:

Yes, that looks correct … unfortunately, not all integrals are "doable" :smile:
 
The equation of motion is not right, to start with.
If the density is not uniform, the force acting on the mass when is at distance r from the center will be
G*m*M(r)/r^2
where M(r) is the mass contained in the sphere of radius r.
This is not 4/3pi*r^3*density . Density is not constant. You need to integrate from 0 to r in order to find the mass.
M(r) will be 4*pi(a/3*r^3-r^4/4) - you should do it again do double check.
But before you do this, check again your density. Of course, if you are interested in a math problem only, it does not matter.
But for a physics problem...
density=a-r ?
So density is zero at r=a and then it becomes negative for r<a.
Not mentioning the units. You will have density equal to distance. (a and r are disatnces, I suppose) Not very physical...
 
:( You're absolutely right... I completely forgot about that... I was more interested in the math at this point. It's sort of analogous to non-uniform charge distributions and using Gauss's law. You need to integrate, but thank you! I was being stupid :/
 
You still end up with an integral in the same sort of form as above.
\int_{r_{0}}^{r(t)}\frac{dr}{\sqrt{\frac{2}{3} \pi G(r^3 - 2ar^2-r_{0}^3+2ar_{0}^2)}}=\int_{0}^{t}dt
 
  • #10
If you expect a nice formula as a result then you'll be disappointed. Few problems will allow for such a thing. I suppose this is not one of them.
The integral that you show in the last post can be solved numerically or maybe can be expressed in term of elliptical functions, I am not sure. Try Mathematica or Maple.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K