Nonuniform density of a planet

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WraithM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Planet
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of an object falling through a planet with a nonuniform density described by the equation \(\rho = a - r\). Participants explore the mathematical formulation of the problem, specifically the differential equation governing the motion of the object, and the challenges associated with solving it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a model where the density of the planet decreases linearly with radius, leading to a differential equation for the motion of an object falling through it.
  • Another participant suggests using the chain rule to express the second derivative of position in terms of velocity and position, indicating a method to approach the solution.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of the proposed equation of motion, particularly regarding the integration of mass within a nonuniform density context.
  • Participants discuss the difficulties encountered when attempting to solve the resulting integrals, with some expressing doubt about the feasibility of obtaining a closed-form solution.
  • One participant acknowledges the need to integrate to find the mass contained within a sphere of radius \(r\) and questions the physicality of the density function proposed.
  • There is a suggestion that the integral may not yield a simple formula and could require numerical methods or special functions for a solution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correctness of the initial equations and the approach to solving the problem. There is no consensus on the feasibility of obtaining a solution or the physical validity of the density function.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the assumptions made about the density function and the implications of negative density values. The discussion highlights the complexity of integrating nonuniform density in gravitational contexts.

WraithM
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I was thinking about a situation like this: You have a planet that has a nonuniform density (mass) like this \rho = a - r where a is just some number and r is the radius away from the center of the planet. Then you have an object falling through the planet. I had no idea how to solve this differential equation. I don't even know if there is a solution. You'd have an F=ma like this: -\frac{G(a - r)(\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3)m}{r^2} = ma. That becomes through simplification: \frac{d^2 r}{dt^2}=\frac{4}{3}\pi a G(r^2 - r). I don't really know much beyond solving simple differential equations. Is this solvable? If there is a solution, how do you get it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WraithM said:
\frac{d^2 r}{dt^2}=\frac{4}{3}\pi a G(r^2 - r). I don't really know much beyond solving simple differential equations. Is this solvable? If there is a solution, how do you get it?

Hi WraithM! :smile:

Use the standard trick of writing dr/dt = v, and then

d2r/dt2

= dv/dt

= dv/dr dr/dt [chain rule]

= v dv/dr :wink:
 
Does that actually work? Do you just separate variables from there? I see the logic of making \frac{d^2 r}{dt^2} = v \frac{dv}{dr}, but I don't want to believe that it's that easy.

For example, take \frac{d^2 r}{dt^2} = g (constant acceleration). Separating variables using v dv/dr: v dv = g dr, that's: v^2/2 = gr
\frac{dr}{dt} = \sqrt{2gr}
\frac{dr}{\sqrt{2gr}} = dt
1/g \sqrt{2gr}=t
r = \frac{gt^2}{2}
Wow, so that actually works?

:/ I'm feeling stupid for not knowing this.

EDIT: I just did this method with my first example, and I get an integral that isn't doable... :/ Am I just stuck then?
 
Last edited:
WraithM said:
Wow, so that actually works?

:biggrin: Woohoo! :biggrin:

(btw, that's how 1/2 mv2 gets into energy equations :wink:)
EDIT: I just did this method with my first example, and I get an integral that isn't doable... :/ Am I just stuck then?

hmm … let's see …

you didn't get vdv = 4/3 πaG (r2 - ar) dr ? :confused:
 
Well, yes. I did get: v \, dv = \frac{4}{3}Ga(r^2 - r)dr
You integrate from (r_{0} to r) that to get v = \sqrt{\frac{8}{3}Ga(r^3/3 - r^2/2 - r_{0}^3/3 + r_{0}^2/2)}. That's all good, but then if you try to go another step further, it blows up. Now I'm solving for r(t). You get: \int_{r_{0}}^{r(t)}\frac{dr}{\sqrt{\frac{8}{3}Ga(r^3/3 - r^2/2 - r_{0}^3/3 + r_{0}^2/2)}} = \int_{0}^{t} dt I don't know how to do that integral. I don't think it's doable. Do you know how to do it? Am I perhaps doing it wrong?
 
WraithM said:
… You get: \int_{r_{0}}^{r(t)}\frac{dr}{\sqrt{\frac{8}{3}Ga(r^3/3 - r^2/2 - r_{0}^3/3 + r_{0}^2/2)}} = \int_{0}^{t} dt I don't know how to do that integral. I don't think it's doable. Do you know how to do it? Am I perhaps doing it wrong?

ah, I didn't realize you wanted to go as far as solving for r as a function of t :redface:

Yes, that looks correct … unfortunately, not all integrals are "doable" :smile:
 
The equation of motion is not right, to start with.
If the density is not uniform, the force acting on the mass when is at distance r from the center will be
G*m*M(r)/r^2
where M(r) is the mass contained in the sphere of radius r.
This is not 4/3pi*r^3*density . Density is not constant. You need to integrate from 0 to r in order to find the mass.
M(r) will be 4*pi(a/3*r^3-r^4/4) - you should do it again do double check.
But before you do this, check again your density. Of course, if you are interested in a math problem only, it does not matter.
But for a physics problem...
density=a-r ?
So density is zero at r=a and then it becomes negative for r<a.
Not mentioning the units. You will have density equal to distance. (a and r are disatnces, I suppose) Not very physical...
 
:( You're absolutely right... I completely forgot about that... I was more interested in the math at this point. It's sort of analogous to non-uniform charge distributions and using Gauss's law. You need to integrate, but thank you! I was being stupid :/
 
You still end up with an integral in the same sort of form as above.
\int_{r_{0}}^{r(t)}\frac{dr}{\sqrt{\frac{2}{3} \pi G(r^3 - 2ar^2-r_{0}^3+2ar_{0}^2)}}=\int_{0}^{t}dt
 
  • #10
If you expect a nice formula as a result then you'll be disappointed. Few problems will allow for such a thing. I suppose this is not one of them.
The integral that you show in the last post can be solved numerically or maybe can be expressed in term of elliptical functions, I am not sure. Try Mathematica or Maple.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K