Norm bounded Sets .... remarks by Garling in Section 11.2 Normed Spaces ....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of norm bounded sets as presented by D. J. H. Garling in "A Course in Mathematical Analysis: Volume II: Metric and Topological Spaces, Functions of a Vector Variable," specifically in Section 11.2. The user, Peter, seeks assistance in rigorously demonstrating the property $$\| \lambda f \|_\infty = \mid \lambda \mid \| f \|_\infty$$. Contributors clarify the steps involved, confirming that $$d( ( \lambda f ) (s) , 0 ) = |\lambda|\|f(s)\|$$ and subsequently leading to the conclusion that $$\| \lambda f \|_\infty = |\lambda|\|f\|_\infty$$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of normed spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with the supremum norm, denoted as $$\| \cdot \|_\infty$$
  • Knowledge of metric spaces and distance functions, specifically $$d_\infty$$
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and logical reasoning
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of normed spaces in detail, focusing on Proposition 11.1.11 from Garling's text
  • Explore the concept of supremum norms and their applications in functional analysis
  • Learn about the implications of scalar multiplication in normed spaces
  • Review examples of normed spaces to solidify understanding of bounded sets
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying functional analysis, researchers in mathematical analysis, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of normed spaces and their properties.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading D. J. H. Garling's book: "A Course in Mathematical Analysis: Volume II: Metric and Topological Spaces, Functions of a Vector Variable" ... ...

I am focused on Chapter 11: Metric Spaces and Normed Spaces ... ...

I need some help in order to understand some remarks by Garling on norm bounded sets made in Section 11.2 on page 311 ... ...

The remarks by Garling made in Section 11.2 on page 311 ... ... read as follows:

View attachment 8995
In the above text from Garling we read the following ...

" ... Arguing as in Proposition 11.1.11,

$$\| f \|_\infty = d_\infty ( f, 0 ) = \text{sup} \{ \| f(s) \| \ : \ s \in S \} $$

is a norm on $$B_E(S)$$ ... ... "I am able to prove two of the conditions for a norm, but am unsure how to formally and rigorously demonstrate that

$$\| \lambda f \|_\infty = \mid \lambda \mid \| f \|_\infty$$
Can someone please help ...
My thoughts so far are as follows:

$$\| \lambda f \|_\infty = d_\infty ( \lambda f, 0 ) = \text{sup} \{ d ( ( \lambda f ) (s) , 0 ) \}$$

$$= \text{sup} \{ d ( \lambda f (s) , 0 ) \}$$ ... ...

But where to from here ... and how do we justify the steps we take?
Hope someone can help ...

Peter
==========================================================================================
The above post mentions Proposition 11.1.11 ... so I am providing text of the same plus some relevant preceding remarks ... as follows ...
View attachment 8996
View attachment 8997
Hope that helps ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Garling - Remarks in Section 11.2 on norm bounded sets .png
    Garling - Remarks in Section 11.2 on norm bounded sets .png
    25.7 KB · Views: 129
  • Garling - 1 - Proposition 11.1.11 ... ... PART 1 .png
    Garling - 1 - Proposition 11.1.11 ... ... PART 1 .png
    22 KB · Views: 138
  • Garling - 2 - Proposition 11.1.11 ... ... PART 2 .png
    Garling - 2 - Proposition 11.1.11 ... ... PART 2 .png
    17.7 KB · Views: 152
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am able to prove two of the conditions for a norm, but am unsure how to formally and rigorously demonstrate that

$$\| \lambda f \|_\infty = \mid \lambda \mid \| f \|_\infty$$

My thoughts so far are as follows:

$$\| \lambda f \|_\infty = d_\infty ( \lambda f, 0 ) = \text{sup} \{ d ( ( \lambda f ) (s) , 0 ) \}$$

$$= \text{sup} \{ d ( \lambda f (s) , 0 ) \}$$ ... ...
$d( ( \lambda f ) (s) , 0 ) = \|( \lambda f ) (s) - 0 \| = \| \lambda (f (s)) \| = |\lambda|\|f(s)\|$.

Then when you take the sup, $\sup\{ d( ( \lambda f ) (s) , 0 )\} = \sup\{|\lambda|\|f(s)\|\} = |\lambda|\sup\{\|f(s)\|\} = |\lambda|\|f\|_\infty.$
 
Opalg said:
$d( ( \lambda f ) (s) , 0 ) = \|( \lambda f ) (s) - 0 \| = \| \lambda (f (s)) \| = |\lambda|\|f(s)\|$.

Then when you take the sup, $\sup\{ d( ( \lambda f ) (s) , 0 )\} = \sup\{|\lambda|\|f(s)\|\} = |\lambda|\sup\{\|f(s)\|\} = |\lambda|\|f\|_\infty.$
Thanks Opalg ... appreciate the help ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K