Norm Ordering for a many electron system

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter janakiraman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Norm System
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of norm ordering in many-electron systems, specifically in the context of non-interacting fermions. The primary definition states that annihilation operators should be placed to the right of creation operators to ensure that the expectation value for the vacuum state is zero. The confusion arises when applying this definition to systems with multiple particles, particularly regarding the placement of operators based on their energy states. The text references the book "Many Body Theory Exposed" and highlights that the ordering rules depend on the energy levels of the operators involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, particularly operator algebra
  • Familiarity with fermionic systems and Slater determinants
  • Knowledge of expectation values in quantum states
  • Basic concepts of Wick ordering and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Wick ordering in quantum field theory
  • Explore the implications of operator ordering in many-body quantum systems
  • Review the mathematical formulation of Slater determinants in fermionic systems
  • Analyze examples of norm ordering in various quantum mechanical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers working with many-body systems or quantum field theory, particularly those focusing on fermionic particles and operator algebra.

janakiraman
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I'm confused with the definition of a norm ordering of operators. The basic definition of norm ordering as understood by me was "Place the annihilation operators to right and creation operators to the left". However I also read another definition "The motivation of norm ordering is to ensure that the expectation value of the normed operators is 0 for vacuum state"

I understand the relation between the above two definitions for a simple non relativistic harmonic oscillator as explained here http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0212061" . But I do not understand the relationship in a many particle system.

Assume a 'N' particle non interacting fermion system, where the ground state is provided by the Slater determinant of the 'N' lowest eigenfunctions. In this case how does placing the annihilation operators (a_{\alpha}) to the right of creation operators (a^{\beta}
ensures that the expectation w.r.t vacuum state to be 0. [Note \alpha and \beta can be different eigen states of the Hamiltonian]. Also I read in a book (Many Body theory Exposed, Chp 8) that placing the annihilator to right is valid only if \alpha and \beta are higher that the total ground state energy of the system. If they are both lower then the creation operator is placed to right of annihilation. If one of them is lower while other is higher than ground state energy, then the ordering doesn't matter. I'm really confused with this issue. It will be great if some one can throw more light into this problem
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try the wikipedia article on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wick_ordering" ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes I had a look at wikipedia. But its confusing. For example If I have 3 operators (2 annihilation (A) and one creation (C)). How must i proceed? Can i just use CAA or ACA? I believe both will give a zero expectation for vacuum state? Which of them must be used for the norm order in this case
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K