Normal subgroups (Sylow Theorem)

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathgirl1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a subgroup H of order p in a group G of order pm (where p is a prime and p > m) is normal in G. The proof utilizes the Sylow Theorems, specifically the third Sylow Subgroup Theorem, which establishes that the number of Sylow p-subgroups n_p divides m and satisfies n_p ≡ 1 (mod p). Since m < p, it follows that n_p must equal 1, indicating that the Sylow p-subgroup P is unique and thus normal in G. Additionally, an alternative approach is suggested that avoids the Sylow Theorems by considering homomorphisms of G on the cosets of a subgroup.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically group orders and subgroups.
  • Familiarity with Sylow Theorems, particularly the third Sylow Subgroup Theorem.
  • Knowledge of group homomorphisms and cosets.
  • Basic properties of prime numbers and their implications in group orders.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the third Sylow Subgroup Theorem in detail.
  • Explore the concept of group homomorphisms and their applications in subgroup analysis.
  • Investigate alternative proofs for normal subgroups without relying on Sylow Theorems.
  • Review examples of groups of order pm to solidify understanding of subgroup structures.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for advanced undergraduate or graduate students in mathematics, particularly those studying abstract algebra, group theory, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of subgroup properties and normality in finite groups.

mathgirl1
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Let G be a group of order pm where p is a prime and p > m. Suppose H is a subgroup of order p. Show that H is normal in G.

There is a very similar problem

Let |G| = p^nm where p is a prime and n \ge 1, p &gt; m. Show that the Sylow p-subgroup of G is normal in G.

Proof:
Let n_p be the number of Sylow p-subgroups of G. By the 3-d Sylow Subgroup Theorem we know that n_p \mid m and that n_p \equiv 1 (mod p). Since m < p and n_p \mid m, it follows that 1 \le n_p \le m &lt; p. Since we also know that n_p \equiv 1 (mod p), it follows that n_p=1. Let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of G. Since for every g \in G, g^{-1}Pg is also a Sylow p-subgroup of G and since n_p=1, it follows that for every g \in G that g^{-1}Pg=P. Hence P is normal in G, as claimed.

So this is the same problem that I need to solve with n=1. Is there a way to solve this without Sylow Theorems or Sylow subgroups? We barely covered that so not sure we can use it to prove this problem.

Also, why is g^{-1}Pg also a Sylow p-subgroup of G since P is?

Any help is appreciated. I would like to solve this problem without Sylow theorems but not sure where to start cause I am already stuck in this thinking.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have shown above that there is exactly one subgroup of order $p$. Let us call it $P$. Furthermore, this is a Sylow $p$-subgroup because $p$ is the largest power of $p$ which divides $|G|=pm$. Thus, by the third theorem all Sylow $p$-subgroups are conjugate. Consider $gPg^{-1}$. Show that this subgroup has order $p$, and so, it is a Sylow $p$-subgroup. But since there is only one such subgroup it follows that $gPg^{-1} = P$. Since this is true for all $p$ we conclude that $P$ is invariant under conjugation, so it is a normal subgroup.
 
Hi,
You asked for a different proof that doesn't use the Sylow theorems. Here is one. The idea of representing (finding a homomorphism) a group G on the cosets of a subgroup is worth remembering.

nx43sw.png
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K