Undergrad Normal Vector & Acceleration: An Explanation for Julien

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the normal vector and its relation to acceleration in the context of special relativity. Julien is grappling with the definition of the normal vector, particularly how it relates to the second derivative of the position vector with respect to arclength rather than time. He questions whether this normal vector represents the normal component of acceleration and seeks clarification on the transition from time as a parameter to arclength. Additionally, he expresses confusion about a formula indicating that the magnitude of the second derivative with respect to arclength is inversely proportional to the radius of curvature, suggesting a connection between curvature and acceleration. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of relating geometric concepts in physics to motion along a curve.
JulienB
Messages
408
Reaction score
12
Hi everybody! I'm currently learning special relativity, and I'm going through the chapter of tangent, normal and binormal vectors. In my teacher's script, the definition of the normal vector eN says:

\vec{e_N} = \frac{d}{ds} \vec{e_T} \cdot \frac{1}{\mid \frac{d}{ds} \cdot \vec{e_T} \mid} = \frac{ \frac{d^2}{ds^2} \vec{x(s)}}{\mid \frac{d^2}{ds^2} \vec{x(s)} \mid}

I think I understand the first equality with the first derivative of the tangent unit vector, but I am unsure to what means the equality: it looks like some sort of acceleration relative to the arclength instead of time, and I guess from that equality that its vector is perpendicular to the trajectory. Is it simply the normal component of acceleration?

There is kind of an explanation earlier in the script but I'm not sure I get it really:

s = s(t) \implies t = t(s) \implies \vec{x(t)} = \vec{x [t(s)]} = \vec{x(s)}<br />

At the end I don't really get how (and why) it goes from time as a parameter to the arclength. Could someone possibly give me a hint?

Thank you very much in advance.Julien.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A little later in the script, I found:

\mid \frac{d^2 \vec{x}}{ds^2} \mid = \frac{1}{R} with R being the radius of the curve. I'm also confused about this formula, it seems to me it would make a part of the acceleration depending on the radius of the curve.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 146 ·
5
Replies
146
Views
10K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K