Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Normalised Radial Coulomb Wave Function

  1. Nov 16, 2015 #1
    Hey there,

    I used Mathematica to find the (non-normalised) wave function of an electron in the vicinity of a Hydrogen nucleus, and converted the answer from one involving Whittaker functions to one involving generalised Laguerre polynomials. My result is shown below:

    LXINrrz.png

    This agrees with the documented non-normalised wave function. However, when I multiply by the documented normalisation constant, to get the following wave function:

    BFd01RQ.png

    It is still not normalised - the integral from 0 to infinity of the absolute square is still not equal to 1.

    Does any one know what I'm doing wrong, and/or how to fix the wave function? Thanks in advance.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 16, 2015 #2

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Which reference did you take for the unnormalized bound-state wavefunction?
     
  4. Nov 17, 2015 #3
    This is the page where I found the function with a Laguerre polynomial (I've rearranged a few terms and added the constants, but otherwise it's the same): http://ampl.github.io/amplgsl/coulomb.html

    I think I know where I'm going wrong, however. It seems that the function is only normalised once this radial part is multiplied by the angular part. I guess I could find the angular part, but I was wandering whether there was a way to just normalise this function on its own, so that I can calculate the probability of finding an electron however far from the nucleus, without worrying about the angular coordinates.
     
  5. Nov 17, 2015 #4

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Of course you can find a constant only from the normalization of the radial part alone, but it's not the one you for the probabilistic interpretation. The unnormalized radial distribution can be used to graph it (critical points, inflection, zeros), but the probability is gotten only from the full wavefunction (which includes the angular part and its own normalization constant).
     
  6. Nov 17, 2015 #5
    Ah, ok. So if I find the angular function(s), could I integrate the absolute square of the whole wave function over θ from 0 to 2π, over ϕ from -π/2 to π/2, then between two values of radius to find the probability of finding the electron between those radii?
     
  7. Nov 17, 2015 #6

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    It's actually in a spherical shell of finite width, because, by the way you've chosen them, the 2 angles vary maximally therefore covering a whole sphere.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Normalised Radial Coulomb Wave Function
  1. Coulomb wave functions (Replies: 0)

Loading...