What is the Normalisation Constant for a Particle in an Infinite Square Well?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The normalization constant for a particle in an infinite square well described by the wave function u(x) = Asin(3πx/a) is A = 1/√a, determined by integrating the squared wave function over the interval 0 < x ≤ a. The energy of the state corresponding to this wave function is E = 9h²/(8ma²), as it corresponds to the quantum number n=3. The width of the well is confirmed to be a, as the potential is zero only within this range.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, particularly infinite square wells.
  • Familiarity with wave functions and their normalization.
  • Knowledge of energy quantization in quantum systems.
  • Proficiency in performing definite integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of normalization constants in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of quantum numbers in particle energy states.
  • Explore the mathematical techniques for integrating trigonometric functions.
  • Investigate the differences between infinite and finite potential wells.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists working with wave functions, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum systems.

hhhmortal
Messages
175
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of unit mass moving in an infinite square well, V=0 for |x|<= a , V=∞ for |x|>a , is described by a wave function u(x) = Asin(3πx/a).

(i) If I normalise the wave function, what is A?

(ii) And what is the energy of state described by this wave function?


The Attempt at a Solution



(i) Normalised the wave function by saying it is only valid from 0<x<=a and every where else is 0.

So I square the wave function, integrate it and I get:

A²a = 1 --> 1/√a

(ii) And the energy of state decribed by this wave function would be 9h²/8ma² , since we know its on n=3.



What I am puzzled about is if the width of the well is 2a or a? I know it is 'a' because the denominator of the wave function tells me it is. But when I use the general formula of:

A= √(2/L) I know L = a so I instead get:

A= √(2/a) which isn't true?


Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hhhmortal said:
(i) Normalised the wave function by saying it is only valid from 0<x<=a and every where else is 0.
Why only 0 &lt; x \le a? Take another close look at that question to figure out the range over which the potential is non-infinite.

hhhmortal said:
What I am puzzled about is if the width of the well is 2a or a? I know it is 'a' because the denominator of the wave function tells me it is. But when I use the general formula of:
The form of the wave function tells you nothing, in general, about the width of the well. You have to get that from other information in the problem - the width of the region in which the potential is zero.
 
hhhmortal said:

Homework Statement



A particle of unit mass moving in an infinite square well, V=0 for |x|<= a , V=∞ for |x|>a , is described by a wave function u(x) = Asin(3πx/a).

(i) If I normalise the wave function, what is A?

(ii) And what is the energy of state described by this wave function?


The Attempt at a Solution



(i) Normalised the wave function by saying it is only valid from 0<x<=a and every where else is 0.

So I square the wave function, integrate it and I get:

A²a = 1 --> 1/√a

(ii) And the energy of state decribed by this wave function would be 9h²/8ma² , since we know its on n=3.



What I am puzzled about is if the width of the well is 2a or a? I know it is 'a' because the denominator of the wave function tells me it is. But when I use the general formula of:

A= √(2/L) I know L = a so I instead get:

A= √(2/a) which isn't true?


Thanks.

Your result is close but awkward on the first part. Go back and redo the integral. You should get the square root of 2 divided by a, not 1 divided by a. The bounds of integration are 0 to a. Given what you've presented here, the width of the well is a.

You have the right idea for the second part, but it should be:

E = 9\pi^2h^2/(2ma^2)
 
diazona said:
Why only 0 &lt; x \le a? Take another close look at that question to figure out the range over which the potential is non-infinite.


The form of the wave function tells you nothing, in general, about the width of the well. You have to get that from other information in the problem - the width of the region in which the potential is zero.

It's actually from -a< x <a which will give a well of width 2a.

If I integrate now this will become 2a(A²) = 1 --> 1/√2a

But If I use A= √(2/L) I know L = 2a so I instead get:

A = √(1/a)

Im clearly going wrong somewhere
 
Probably posting your integration helps others to spot your mistakes.

if you really do not see it on your own.

Well you probably remember cos^2 + sin^2 = 1, so integrating over full peroids of a sine squared (or cosine squared) gives you half of the peroid length.
 
For the first part the answer is A=1/√a
 
Yea it was a mistake I made with the integration, I finally got the correct answer. Is the energy state for this wave function simply:

9h²/8ma²

since we know n=3 from the wave function given?
 
Yes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K