Normality of (COONa)2 - KMNO4 titration (redox reaction)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the Normality of a (COONa)2 solution using a 0.01 Normality KMNO4 solution in a redox titration. The equation N1V1=N2V2 is employed to find the Normality, with considerations regarding the stoichiometry of the reaction. It is established that the 0.01N permanganate solution corresponds to 0.002M, and the Normality of oxalate is twice its concentration. The ambiguity of normality is acknowledged, with a note that its use has been discouraged by IUPAC for over 40 years.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of redox reactions and stoichiometry
  • Knowledge of Normality and its calculation
  • Familiarity with KMNO4 as a titrant
  • Basic principles of titration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of stoichiometry in redox titrations
  • Learn about IUPAC recommendations on the use of Normality
  • Explore the concept of equivalents in acid-base and redox reactions
  • Study the properties and applications of KMNO4 in analytical chemistry
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, laboratory technicians, and professionals involved in analytical chemistry and titration methods.

Man0uzz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We used 14ml of a KMNO4 solution of 0.01 Normality, to find the Normality of a (COONa)2 solution.
If we took 10ml of the (COONa)2 solution, what should its Normality be?

I thought about using the following equation: N1V1=N2V2

Does the stoichiometry of the redox reaction affect the equation above? Should we multiply N2V2 with 5/2 because of it?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Most likely 0.01N permanganate is actually 0.002M (five equivalents per mole), and normality of oxalate is twice its concentration (two equivalents per mole in redox reactions). If so equation as written should work with no additional stoichiometric coefficients.

But you are right that normality can be ambiguous and sometimes depends on the context, so treat above just as a guess.
 
Borek said:
normality can be ambiguous
AAmmmeeeennnnn.
 
Borek said:
But you are right that normality can be ambiguous and sometimes depends on the context, so treat above just as a guess.
And I think therefore its use is discouraged for at least 40 years by IUPAC and other organizations...
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
23K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K