Normalization and orthogonality of wavefunctions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization and orthogonality of two specific wavefunctions in quantum mechanics. Participants explore the mathematical integration required to achieve normalization and confirm orthogonality, addressing both the theoretical framework and practical challenges in performing the necessary calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents two wavefunctions and expresses difficulty in normalizing them into an acceptable integrable form.
  • Another participant suggests that since the variables are independent, the integration can be performed separately for each variable, and if the integral yields zero, the functions are orthogonal.
  • A later reply emphasizes the need to perform the integrals and questions the original poster's understanding of the integration process.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of the integrals, with one participant mentioning reliance on integral tables and expressing uncertainty about the integration process.
  • Participants recommend specific resources for integral tables, including a book known for its comprehensive collection of integrals.
  • There is a suggestion to focus on the first wavefunction and use integration by parts to simplify the radial integral.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to perform the integrals for normalization and orthogonality, but there is no consensus on the specific methods or approaches to take, particularly regarding the integration techniques and the complexity of the functions involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about their mathematical background, which may limit their ability to perform the required integrations. There are also references to potential missing knowledge from earlier calculus courses that could aid in understanding the integration process.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners in quantum mechanics, particularly those grappling with the mathematical aspects of wavefunction normalization and orthogonality. It may also benefit individuals seeking resources for integral calculus.

jessedupont
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have two wavefunctions that I need to normalize but I cannot figure out how to get them into an acceptable integrable form...
the first is psi=(2-(r/asub0))*e^(-r/asub0)
the second is psi=rsin(theta)*cos(phi)*e^(-r/2asub0)
I know these need to be in the form (where psi will be name y for simplicity sake)
1=int(Y*Ydtao). and this will eventually come to the form (let ~ be the symbol for integral where 1~2 is the integral from 1 to 2 for example.)
1=0~2pi 0~pi 0~inf r^2dr*sin(theta)*dtheta*dphi

then i need to confirm that these two functions are mutually orthogonal but as long as I can integrate them I should be able to figure out all that.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]Now I got to be honest here, I'm a little shaky on this, but since $r, \theta, \phi$ are not functions of each other you can just integrate both those functions over all space just like you said. That is, you can do the $r$ part times the $\theta$ part times the $phi$ part and if you get $0$ then they are orthogonal.[/tex]
 
(jessedupont: it's usual on this forum to use latex to make one's equations more
readable. Since this is your first post, I've converted some of your stuff to latex to
help you get started. To see the latex code for the equations, just click on them.
That will also give you a link to a quickstart latex guide...)

jessedupont said:
I have two wavefunctions that I need to normalize but I cannot figure out how to get them into an acceptable integrable form...
the first is

[tex] \psi ~=~ \left(2 - \frac{r}{a_0}\right) e^{-r/a_0}[/tex]

the second is

[tex] \psi ~=~ r \sin(\theta) \cos(\phi) e^{-r/2a_0}[/tex]

I know these need to be in the form (where psi will be name y for simplicity sake)
[tex] 1 ~=~ \int \bar{Y} Y d\tau[/tex]

and this will eventually come to the form (let ~ be the symbol for integral where 1~2 is the integral from 1 to 2 for example.)
1=0~2pi 0~pi 0~inf r^2dr*sin(theta)*dtheta*dphi

by which I assume you mean:

[tex] 1 ~=~ \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi \int_0^\pi sin(\theta) d\theta<br /> \int_0^\infty \bar{\psi} \psi \; r^2 dr ~~~~~~~~ (?)[/tex]

then i need to confirm that these two functions are mutually orthogonal but as long as I can integrate them I should be able to figure out all that.

So what exactly is your problem? Just perform the integrals...
 
thanks for the help strangerep. I'm just not too sure how to integrate it or what it should look like before integrating. I only had through cal II so I think I missed out on some of the helpful stuff for this situation. I tried to integrate what I had on wolfram but it gave me another variable in my answer (refering to the first wavefunction).
 
jessedupont said:
I'm just not too sure how to integrate it

Make friends with a good table of integrals. :smile:

(Unless your professor really expects you to work out all your integrals completely from scratch, of course.)
 
Any tips on some good integral tables. (for really complex ones) all of the ones I've found don't have anything that complex...
 
Grashteyn and Ryzhik's book ((any edition, probably the latest has more infomation) is a great source for integrals (you need definite integrals) of all sorts of function, Laguerre polynomials included.
 
jessedupont said:
thanks for the help strangerep. I'm just not too sure how to integrate it or what it should look like before integrating. I only had through cal II so I think I missed out on some of the helpful stuff for this situation. I tried to integrate what I had on wolfram but it gave me another variable in my answer (refering to the first wavefunction).

OK. Concentrate on your first wavefunction and try to normalize that.
Substitute your [tex]\psi[/tex] into the latex integral expression I gave.
Since it has no angular dependence those parts of the integral are trivial.
(Do you agree? If not, then you really do need to take a remedial calculus
course. :-)

The radial part of the integral is done using integration by parts.
E.g., use:

[tex] e^{-r} \, dr ~=~ - d(e^{-r})[/tex]

and then integrate by parts. Then repeat this technique until you
get rid of the r's.

If that's not enough explanation, then maybe you should move this
question over to the calculus forum since it's only math at this point.
 
jessedupont said:
Any tips on some good integral tables. (for really complex ones) all of the ones I've found don't have anything that complex...

Ever since I was an undergraduate (almost 40 years now), I've used the https://www.amazon.com/dp/1584882913/?tag=pfamazon01-20. Your example reduces (after multiplying out the polynomials) to a sum of integrals of the form

[tex]\int {r^n e^{-ar}}[/tex]

which I'm pretty sure are in those tables, although I don't have my copy at home to check. I know I've done integrals like those in the past.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K