Normalization of the Angular Momentum Ladder Operator

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the matrix representation of the angular momentum ladder operators, J±. The key equation used is J± | jm ⟩ = N± | jm ± 1 ⟩, leading to the expression for the normalization constants |N±|². The confusion arises in understanding the transition from the matrix element ⟨ jm | J±† J± | jm ⟩ to the normalization constants, which is clarified by noting that both |jm⟩ and |jm±1⟩ are normalized to unity. A crucial mathematical insight provided is that the matrix element ⟨ jm | J∓ | jm ± 1 ⟩ can be related to its Hermitian conjugate, aiding in the derivation. This clarification resolves the initial misunderstanding regarding the normalization process.
PatsyTy
Messages
30
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Obtain the matrix representation of the ladder operators ##J_{\pm}##.

Homework Equations



Remark that ##J_{\pm} | jm \rangle = N_{\pm}| jm \pm 1 \rangle##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The textbook states ##|N_{\pm}|^2=\langle jm | J_{\pm}^\dagger J_{\pm} | jm \rangle##, from here it is straightforward:

##\langle jm | J_{\mp} J_{\pm} | jm \rangle = \langle jm | (J^2 - J_z^2 \pm J_z | jm \rangle = \langle jm | \big( j(j+1)|jm\rangle-m^2\hbar^2 |jm\rangle \pm m \hbar^2 | jm \rangle\big)##

Giving us ##|N_\pm |^2=j(j+1)-\hbar^2 m (m\pm 1)##

What I do not understand is the very first step where we write out ##|N_{\pm}|^2=\langle jm | J_{\pm}^\dagger J_{\pm} | jm \rangle## from the given equation ##J_{\pm} | jm \rangle = N_{\pm}| jm \pm 1 \rangle##.

I have tried multiplying the first equation by the hermitian conjugate of ##J_\pm|jm\rangle## giving

##\langle jm | J_\mp J_\pm | jm \rangle = \langle jm | J_\mp N_{\pm}| jm \pm 1 \rangle = N_{\pm} \langle jm | J_\mp | jm \pm 1 \rangle ## however I don't think this is correct as I don't see how I can get a second ##N_\pm## from ##\langle jm | J_\mp | jm \pm 1 \rangle ##.

The text gives the explanation "Since both ##|jm\rangle## and ##|jm+1\rangle## are normalized to unity..." and that's the justification for this step. I don't fully trust this qualitative description so I am trying to write it out mathematically. Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PatsyTy said:
I have tried multiplying the first equation by the hermitian conjugate of ##J_\pm|jm\rangle## giving

##\langle jm | J_\mp J_\pm | jm \rangle = \langle jm | J_\mp N_{\pm}| jm \pm 1 \rangle = N_{\pm} \langle jm | J_\mp | jm \pm 1 \rangle ## however I don't think this is correct as I don't see how I can get a second ##N_\pm## from ##\langle jm | J_\mp | jm \pm 1 \rangle ##.

Here's the part that you are missing: For any matrix element of the form \langle A |O|B \rangle, we have:

\langle A |O|B \rangle = \langle B |O^\dagger|A \rangle^*

So in particular,
\langle jm | J_\mp | jm \pm 1 \rangle = \langle jm\pm 1 | J_\pm | jm \rangle^*

See if that helps.
 
  • Like
Likes PatsyTy
stevendaryl said:
Here's the part that you are missing: For any matrix element of the form \langle A |O|B \rangle, we have:

\langle A |O|B \rangle = \langle B |O^\dagger|A \rangle^*

So in particular,
\langle jm | J_\mp | jm \pm 1 \rangle = \langle jm\pm 1 | J_\pm | jm \rangle^*

See if that helps.

Thanks! I got it right away with that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K