Not sure which formula to use Deals with work and position

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by a variable force acting on a particle of mass 6.26 kg, with its position described by a cubic function of time. Participants are exploring the appropriate formulas and methods to determine the work over a specified time interval.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the second derivative to find acceleration and question whether to apply F=ma or F=mg. There is uncertainty about the applicability of certain formulas due to the nature of the force being variable.
  • Some suggest integrating the force over distance instead of using W=Fs, while others mention the work-energy theorem as a potential approach.
  • Concerns are raised about initial and final velocities, particularly whether the initial velocity is zero, leading to confusion in calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's ideas, providing guidance on the use of derivatives and integrals. There is recognition of mistakes in calculations, and some participants are revisiting their approaches based on feedback. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, but no consensus has been reached on the correct method or final answer.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of homework constraints regarding significant figures and the requirement for a specific format in answers. Participants are also grappling with the implications of using a cubic position function versus constant acceleration scenarios.

iJamJL
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A one-dimensional force acts on a particle of mass m = 6.26 kg in such a way that its position is given by:

x = 0.484t3 - 33.6t

Find W, the work done by this force during the first 1.49 s.

Homework Equations


F=mg
F=ma
W=F*distance

The Attempt at a Solution


To find the distance, I plugged in 1.49 into the formula they gave, and I got (-48.5). I know that to find work, the formula is W=F*s, so in order to find the force, I'm not sure which formula to use.

I think I should be using F=ma, and to find the acceleration, I can take the second derivative of the given formula. However, I forget whether that is allowed in one-dimension. If not, then do I use F=mg? If I use F=mg, then the answer for work will come out positive. If I use F=ma, then the work comes out negative.

Here are my results:

W=Fs
W=ma*s
W=6.26*18.18*(-48.5)
W=(-5519.6)JW=Fs
W=mg*s
W=6.26*(-9.81)*(-48.5)
W=2978.4 J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
to find the acceleration, I can take the second derivative of the given formula.
Yes! Do that and you will find that the acceleration varies with time so you can't use W=Fs; instead you have to integrate F*ds.

Gravity is not involved in this. It would cause a constant acceleration and a distance formula of s = Vi*t + .5*a*t² rather than the cubic formula of this problem.
 
hi iJamJL! :smile:
iJamJL said:
I think I should be using F=ma, and to find the acceleration, I can take the second derivative of the given formula. However, I forget whether that is allowed in one-dimension. If not, then do I use F=mg?

if you need to find the force, then yes you use F = ma

and yes the acceleration is the second derviative, even in three dimensions! :smile:

(what is worrying you about that? :confused:)
To find the distance, I plugged in 1.49 into the formula they gave, and I got (-48.5). I know that to find work, the formula is W=F*s, so in order to find the force, I'm not sure which formula to use.

yes, that does give you the total distance

but W = F*s only works if F is constant

here, F isn't constant, so you would have to use W = ∫ F.ds

however it might be simpler to use the work-energy theorem, and calculate the difference in kinetic energy :wink:
 
Thanks for the replies!

tiny-tim said:
however it might be simpler to use the work-energy theorem, and calculate the difference in kinetic energy :wink:

I didn't realize that until you pointed it out! I tried it out, but I think I made a mistake somewhere. Here's what I did:

To find the final velocity, which for this case is at 1.49s, we take the first derivative at 1.49:
x = 0.484t3 - 33.6t
dx/dt= 2*(.484)t^2 - 33.6
v= (-30.38)m/s

W=ΔKE
W= 1/2*m(v-final^2) - 1/2*m(v-initial^2)
**v-initial is 0 because t=0, x=0**
W=1/2*6.26*(-30.38)^2
W=2888.8 J

I tried entering that into my online homework system and it came out wrong. The system doesn't really care for the form that the answer is, as long as there are 3 significant digits. That means that I solved for this incorrectly! :cry:
 
iJamJL said:
x = 0.484t3 - 33.6t
dx/dt= 2*(.484)t^2 - 33.

erm :redface:3*t2 :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
erm :redface:3*t2 :wink:

lol I wrote that on my scrap paper, but typed and calculated it incorrectly!

My end result came to:

v=(.484)*3*(1.49^2) - 33.6
=(-30.4)m/s

W=1/2*m*v^2
W=1/2*6.26*(-30.4^2)
W=2892.6 J

That's still coming out as incorrect.
 
iJamJL said:
W=1/2*m*v^2

no, W = 1/2*m*v22 - 1/2*m*v12 :rolleyes:
 
iJamJL said:
Thanks for the replies!



I didn't realize that until you pointed it out! I tried it out, but I think I made a mistake somewhere. Here's what I did:

To find the final velocity, which for this case is at 1.49s, we take the first derivative at 1.49:
x = 0.484t3 - 33.6t
dx/dt= 2*(.484)t^2 - 33.6
v= (-30.38)m/s

W=ΔKE
W= 1/2*m(v-final^2) - 1/2*m(v-initial^2)
**v-initial is 0 because t=0, x=0**
Just because t=0 and x=0, that does not imply that v(0) = 0. Plug t=0 into your velocity formula.
 
tiny-tim said:
no, W = 1/2*m*v22 - 1/2*m*v12 :rolleyes:

Wow, I'm bad at this. I initially thought that v-initial would be 0, but then I looked back and realized it's not. *facepalm*

v(0)=(-33.6)m/s
v(1.49)=(-30.4)m/s

W=1/2*m*(v2^2) - 1/2*m*(v1^2)
W=1/2*6.26(-30.4^2) - 1/2*6.26*(-33.6^2)
W=2892.6 - 3533.6
W=(-641) J

Did I finally get the correct answer? :approve:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K