Derive the formula for the frequency of a spring

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two masses, m1 and m2, connected by a spring with a spring constant k, and requires deriving the formula for the frequency of their vibrations along the line connecting them. The context includes concepts from mechanics and oscillatory motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss finding the center of mass and using it in the equations of motion. There are attempts to manipulate formulas related to acceleration and Hooke's law. Some suggest defining displacements and relating them to the spring's stretch, while others propose using relative accelerations to derive the frequency.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being explored. Some participants have offered hints and alternative methods, but there is no explicit consensus on a single method or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a question regarding whether calculus or differential equations are required for the problem. Participants are also considering the implications of defining displacements and the relationship between the two masses.

astroman707
Messages
61
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Two masses m1 and m2 are joined by a spring of spring constant k. Show that the frequency of vibration of these masses along the line connecting them is
ω = √[ k(m1 + m2) / (m1*m2) ]
(Hint: Center of mass remains at rest.)

Homework Equations


f = w/2π
w = √(k/m)
F = -kx
a = - w2x

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried finding the center of mass and using that as m, in ma = kx
I also tried manipulating the formula for acceleration, and plugging it into hooke's law, but that didn"t seem right either. I'm pretty lost to be honest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I take it that you know that for a fixed spring on one end and a mass m on the other that the frequency of oscillation is ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}##

If you try to work it out as if one of the masses was fixed and another notional mass vibrating relative to it such that the acceleration of that mass is equal to the relative acceleration between the two masses m1 and m2, you can solve the problem. Call the notional single mass that is vibrating ##\mu##. If you set ##\mu a_{rel} = -kx## where ##a_{rel} = a_2 - a_1##, you can see that ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{\mu}}##. You just have to determine what ##\mu## is. (hint: by Newton's third law ##m_1a_1 = - m_2a_2##)

AM
 
Last edited:
Hello @astroman707,

'Just curious, is this problem from coursework that requires calculus or differential equations?

Anyway, there's another way to approach this problem if you don't wish to use relative accelerations.

The first order of business is to define your displacements and then relate them to the stretch of the spring. For example, if you choose to define that x_1 is positive when m_1 moves to the left and x_2 is positive when m_2 moves to the right, then x = x_1 + x_2. On the other hand, if you want to define positive in the same x-direction for both, then there will be a negative sign in your equation somewhere (e.g., x = x_2 - x_1). Anyway, the choice is yours, but you'll need to define your terms before we move on.

With that, you should have enough to form two differential equations, one for each mass, by using Newton's second law. But don't worry, you'll only need to use one of them.

The trick then is to use the hint that @Andrew Mason made in the previous post. You're interim goal is to find a relationship of the ratio \frac{x_1}{x_2} in terms of m_1 and m_2. Andrew's hint about Newton's third law will get you there.

After that, do a little substitution and you'll have all you need to solve either of the second order, ordinary differential equations and you'll have your \omega.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Andrew Mason
If you use Collinsmark's approach you have to keep in mind that ##x_1## and ##x_2## are the respective displacements of ##m_1## and ##m_2## from the centre of mass of the two-body system.

AM
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K