cookiemonster
- 977
- 0
Oh, I can answer that one. Because M. Night Shyamalan can't see water in the air, and therefore it doesn't exist.
cookiemonster
cookiemonster
The discussion revolves around file sharing methods and platforms, particularly in the context of peer-to-peer (P2P) networks. Participants explore various software options, their experiences, and the implications of using these services, touching on both technical aspects and ethical considerations.
Participants express a range of opinions on the effectiveness and safety of various file-sharing platforms, with no clear consensus on the best option. Ethical considerations regarding file sharing and the pricing of media also generate differing viewpoints.
Participants reference specific software and their experiences, but there are unresolved questions about the legality and ethics of file sharing, as well as the technical limitations of different platforms.
Individuals interested in file sharing technologies, ethical implications of media consumption, and those seeking alternatives to mainstream P2P networks may find this discussion relevant.
Mr. Robin Parsons said:differences between a photocopier that can make one copy at a time and costs money, and a computer that can instantly reproduce millions of copies, for free,
So the issue of the Judges decision is interesting, inasmuch as the Judge is Right in what was decided, cause it is in accordance with Canadian law, as you are allowed to make a copy for your own personal use, so the photocopier in the library and the computer on the net have equvalence in that respect, so actually what the judge provides to us is the principals of actions and activity in a democracy, as in having upheld the Law "As it is Written", if it is deemed to be damaging to society, then the Legislators (House of Commons in Canada) are meant to write New Law, amend the existing Law, correct whatever is seen as deficeit, (if deficiencies are even seen) and hence we have the function of democracy...not radical Judges setting public agendas, but a government that, well, right now, in Canada, they seem to be going into "election mode" which means now NOTHING is going to happen to anything that is actually on The Countries Agenda and the Media*[/color], (who will not report on a single one of the Planetary Firsts that I have, by the Grace of God, been able to accomplish) will be full of nothing but the rhetoric of politicking, sooooo not much new here, you?Mr. Robin Parsons said:PS as for the Judges decision, apparently the differences between a photocopier that can make one copy at a time and costs money, and a computer that can instantly reproduce millions of copies, for free, well, welcome to the age of knowledge...
Yup, and buy discs, (CD's) throws those costs out the window a little doesn't it?ShawnD said:The cost is comparable. A VHS tape is about $1.50 last time I checked. My 120,000,000kB hard drive cost me $171 (after tax) and a most movies are about 715,000kB. That's about 168 movies per hard drive, which makes the storage cost $1.02 per movie.
chroot said:Usenet. No comparison. None.
HUH? DVD's what are they?ShawnD said:Most movies don't even fit on CDs. That throws your theory out the window.
Not entirely, as the search for a lessor cost is indicative of a business under financial pressure...and the future consequences of this is, are, as yet, unwritten/unknown...dduardo said:From the New York Times:
"The bulk of the EMI job losses stem from the outsourcing of compact disc and DVD manufacturing."
I guess that throws away the theory that file sharing has forced EMI to dump loads of employees.
ShawnD said:The cost is comparable. A VHS tape is about $1.50 last time I checked. My 120,000,000kB hard drive cost me $171 (after tax) and a most movies are about 715,000kB. That's about 168 movies per hard drive, which makes the storage cost $1.02 per movie.
Mr. Robin Parsons said:Yes, legal now in Canada, and EMI is apparently either about to, (or has already) lay off (Pink slips, and we do not mean 'car registrations') about 1500 PEOPLE...
.
Mr. Robin Parsons said:Yup, and buy discs, (CD's) throws those costs out the window a little doesn't it?
ShawnD said:Most movies don't even fit on CDs.
Mr. Robin Parsons said:HUH? DVD's what are they?
My videos are all about 700MB. All video names are removed for obvious reasonsphatmonkey said:My movies are 2-4.7 GB, so even more expensive than you are thinking.
Mr. Robin Parsons said:Yup, and buy discs, (CD's) throws those costs out the window a little doesn't it?
Nothing! it is/was a question NOT a comment, so what is your problem? aside from one CD will hold 700MB least the ones I can get will...and I had/have (they moved) a friend who had "lots of movies" (on CD's!) so knowing a little about what I am talking about seemed to me to help...ShawnD said:(SNIP)[/color]You said CDs, so I answered your post. Now you make a rude comment like that. What is your problem? (SNoP)[/color]
lesser known artists became better known artists and subsequently sold more albums and made more money.Mr. Robin Parsons said:So the lessor known artist made money too, or nothing? ("gave it all away")