What is the convention for denoting functions of two variables in statistics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Legendre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Click For Summary
In statistics, the notation f(x; a) is commonly used to denote functions of two variables, particularly when indicating that a distribution depends on a parameter. This format is often seen in mathematical statistics, where parameters are represented as vectors, such as f(x; θ) for a normal distribution with mean and standard deviation. The semicolon notation emphasizes the dependence of the function on both the variable x and the parameter θ. While f(x, a) can also be used, it is less common in the context of statistical functions. Understanding these conventions is crucial for accurately interpreting statistical models and distributions.
Legendre
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Quick question...

I have seen both being used : f(x,a) and f(x;a). What is the usual convention? Are both acceptable to denote functions of 2 variables (in this case f is a function of both x and a). Or are there vital differences between the two that I don't know about?

Thanks! :)

Homework Equations



N.A.

The Attempt at a Solution



N.A.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't recall ever seeing this notation -- f(x; a) -- being used.
 
notation like f(x;a) is used in mathematical statistics when you want to show that a distribution depends on a parameter (real or vector-valued). for example, if you are talking about a normal distribution with some mean and standard deviation, writing
\theta = (\mu, \sigma) the density would be indicated f(x;\theta)

it indicates that the function depends on x and involves a parameter \theta (so, as we say in statistics, by varying \theta we obtain not one but a family of normal distributions.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K